Kevin J Mahoney

Kevin J Mahoney's Legal Cases (48)

Cambridge, MA

Criminal defense Lawyer at Cambridge, MA

Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, DUI & DWI ... +3 more

Message View Profile
Message View Profile
Criminal defense

Commonwealth vs. Deborah R.

Sep 20, 2000

OUTCOME: Not Guilty, Guilty

001-Uttering – Not Guilty 009-Obtaining Narcotics – Hung 002-Uttering – Hung 010-Obtaining Narcotics – Hung 003-Uttering – Hung 011-Obtaining Narcotics – Hung 004-Uttering – Hung 01 ... 2-Obtaining Narcotics – Hung 005-Uttering – Hung 013-Obtaining Narcotics – Hung 006-Uttering – Hung 014-Obtaining Narcotics – Hung 007-Uttering – Hung 015-Obtaining Narcotics – Hung 008-Obtaining Narcotics– Not Guilty 016-21-Receiving Stolen Property (a prescription pad) – Guilty Co-defendant testified that client was ring leader of a group passing prescription drugs, who had beaten, threatened, kidnaped, and robbed her and had sold her drugs. Jury deliberated for 12 hours and repeatedly reported that they were hopelessly deadlocked, before judge forced them to return verdicts.

Criminal defense

Commonwealth vs. Raymond H.

Sep 13, 2000

OUTCOME: Not Guilty

Assault & Battery – Not Guilty Assault & Battery w/ Dang. Weap. – Not Guilty Driving to Endanger – Not Guilty Police responded to 911 call of a woman beaten by man and thrown from a moving c ... ar. Ambulance summonsed. Woman taken to hospital and diagnosed with multiple contusions. Defendant was jury foreman on Commonwealth vs. Otto from Sept. 99

Criminal defense

Commonwealth vs. William J. T.

Sep 01, 2000

OUTCOME: Not Guilty

Possession of Marijuana – Not Guilty Arresting Officer testified that he smelled overpowering odor of marijuana emanating from defendant’s vehicle. Defendant seated in passenger seat. Officer fo ... und marijuana beneath passenger seat.

Criminal defense

Commonwealth vs. George R.

Aug 09, 2000

OUTCOME: Not Guilty

Armed Robbery – Not Guilty Two eyewitnesses separately selected client’s photo from mug shot books. Witnesses positively identified Defendant in court. Cross-examined witnesses on descriptions t ... hey originally gave to police.

Criminal defense

Commonwealth vs. James W.

Apr 24, 2000

OUTCOME: Not Guilty

OUI 1st – Not Guilty Driving at 65 mph in a 35 mph zone, Defendant crossed double yellow line, forcing oncoming police cruiser off the road. Defendant reeked of odor of alcohol, had slurred speech ... , watery, bloodshot eyes and was very unsteady on his feet. Defendant failed all three field sobriety tests and admitted drinking 3 or 4 beers. Booking room video showed defendant unsteady, slurring, making contradictory statements and, at times, incoherent and engaged in bizarre behavior. Attorney Mahoney successfully moved to suppress the videotape

Criminal defense

Commonwealth vs. Heriberto T.

Mar 13, 2000

OUTCOME: Not Guilty

OUI 1st – Not Guilty Defendant driving 58 mph in a 40 mph zone. Defendant admitted to drinking 4 - 5 beers and to being lost. Defendant refused breathalyzer. Video showed defendant failing field s ... obriety tests, slurring, stammering, refusing breathalyzer, and arguing with officer.

Criminal defense

Commonwealth vs. Aldaberto O.

Sep 30, 1999

OUTCOME: Not Guilty

OUI 4th – Not Guilty Failure to Stop – Not Guilty Defendant weaved all over road, refused to stop when signaled, almost struck curb when he finally stopped, staggered from his car and nearly fe ... ll down attempting both one-leg raise test and heel-to-toe. Defendant did not testify

Criminal defense

Commonwealth vs. Edwin M.

May 20, 1999

OUTCOME: Not Guilty

OUI 1st – Not Guilty Defendant had odor alcohol, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, could not say alphabet and failed all field sobriety tests. So angry was State Trooper following cross-examination ... that he threatened Attorney Mahoney outside courthouse.

Criminal defense

Commonwealth vs. Eliot M.

Mar 21, 1999

OUTCOME: Not Guilty, Hung

Indecent A&B: Not Guilty Indecent A&B: Not Guilty See description below. 03/03/99-03/06/99 Indecent A&B: Hung Indecent A&B: Hung Defendant slept in room with daughter and her 9 year-old frien ... d. Alleged victim testified that client had been molesting her for at least 6 months. She said when he started to rub her stomach that night, which had always been a prelude to him touching her vagina, she threw-up on herself. She told her mother next morning. Mother and Father confronted defendant that day.

Criminal defense

Commonwealth vs. Robert R.

Nov 23, 1998

OUTCOME: Guilty

According to police, defendant weaving wildly up Rt. 93 northbound. After stop, defendant pretended to be suffering from an asthma attack and then claimed to be having a heart attack. Defendant refused ... breathalyzer and to have hospital test his blood. Prosecutor used defendant’s prior drunk driving conviction to impeach defendant’s wife who claimed defendant had not had a drink in 27 years. Defendant testified that he had not had drink in 10 years.

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
Learn More About the Avvo Rating