Expert Advice When You Need It Most

David Joseph Feeney

6.6

Good

10

Experience 3.5 star rating
Industry Recognition 1.5 star rating
Professional Conduct 5.0 star rating

What is the Avvo Rating?

No professional misconduct found.

Overview

Practice Areas

Chart?chs=124x124&cht=p&chp=4
  • 20% Business
  • 20% Employment / Labor
  • 20% Personal Injury
  • 20% Corporate / Incorporation
  • 20% Litigation

Contact Information

References

Client Reviews

Average Client Rating


5 star rating

“wonderful guy”

Posted by: Valerie, 2010-09-28 over 1 year ago.

Client Review: my husband and i went to him for a bankruptcy . he was so helpful and informative. he went well above and beyond to help us figure out what was... more
Flag

1 star rating

“Don't use this guy”

Posted by: a Banking client, 2009-06-24 over 2 years ago.

Client Review: It was a most horrible service I have ever received. He had to send letter on my behalf to the lender it wasn't even send with certified mail. He... more
Flag

Peer Endorsements

Endorse a fellow lawyer, get more visits to your profile

In addition to providing a simple way to express your gratitude to fellow lawyers, any time you add an endorsement to a peer's profile, a link to your profile will appear on it.

Endorse this lawyer

Résumé

 

License

15 years since David Joseph Feeney was first licensed to practice law.

State License status Year acquired Last updated by Avvo
Washington Active 1997 01/31/2012

We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.

Education

School Major Degree Graduated
University of Durham, England LL.M - Master of Laws 1999
Creighton University School of Law Law JD - Juris Doctor 1996
See all 3 degrees

Associations

Position Association Name Duration
Member Washington State Bar Association 1997-present
Member Nebraska State Bar Association 1996-present
See all 3 association entries

Portfolio

Publications

Article Publication Date
The European Commission’s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction over Corporate Mergers Georgia State University Law Review 2002