I am currently waiting for a video game design independent company to get back to me about the contract they have put up. They are currently going through a Lawyer to set up the contract so that no one will get ripped off. I want a lawyer to loo...
You are wise to have the contract reviewed by an attorney. There are plenty of attorneys in the Seattle area, including myself, who could help you. I have worked with several teenagers who are still living with their parents. If you are eighteen or older, it does not matter at all from a legal standpoint who you live with. If you are suggesting that you are short on funds, then yes lawyers cost money. How much is your artwork worth to you? It should be worth spending a little money on an attorney. There are plenty of older artists out there who probably wish they had spoken to an attorney before signing a contract. Congratulations on having someone interested in your art work and good luck with your project.See question
It is for a poster that will show the city names of where teams play/are located and it is to be sold for a commercial profit in the UK. Would it also be possible to have the name of the city in the same colour that the team plays in (e....
Probably not. But you need to ask a UK attorney, not a U.S. attorney.See question
I created an art piece and was asked to send it as they were creating a book and would possible include my piece. I sent it and then it came back with no note or anything so I figured it was not going to be used. That was 2007. In 2011 Gourd and F...
If you are the author (creator) of the work, then you own the copyright. You have total control over who distributes it and who makes copies. The publisher needs your permission to put a picture of your work in the book.
There is a question of fact as to whether you gave permission with your original submission. You will need to talk to an attorney about this.
Did you register your work with the Copyright Office before the book was published? If you did then if you did not give permission you could sue for statutory damages up to $150,000 per infringement (and possibly every copy of the book would be considered a separate infringement). You can also obtain attorneys fees. You would probably not want to sue and you would probably not have to. You would have considerable bargaining power to work out a deal with the publishers.
If you did not register your work with the Copyright Office before the book was published, you can only sue for your actual damages. Again this is a fact question, but I doubt the damages would be more than a few hundred dollars. You would be in a very weak position with the publisher. You might be able to get them to at least give you credit if they reprint the book.
You can see why it is important to register the copyright in your works with the U.S. Copyright office.See question
i have dealt with someone for 2 weeks now who is continually saying things to me to try to make me angry. i honestly dont know how to handle this. i dont know what the law is. i dont want to call the cops. She will not follow thru with anything sh...
A defamation lawsuit is probably not the way to go. Most personal problems are not going to be solved by lawsuits. You can sue someone for defamation. Any lawsuit is expensive to pursue. And proving the elements of defamation can be difficult.
Defamation is a false statement, maliciously or knowingly made to injure someone, usually through ridicule and damage to that person's reputation. Libel is written defamation. Slander is oral defamation.
1) a false statement concerning another person.
2) an unprivileged communication to a third party
3) fault amounting to
for public officials and figures - actual malice (actual knowledge that the statement is false or reckless disregard for the truth or falseness of the statement)
for private figures - negligence (what a reasonably prudent person would do, acting under the same or similar circumstances)
In many cases damages is the hardest part to prove. Have you actually been damaged enough to justify suing this person? Probably not. Can you prove your damages? Again, probably not.
If the person only made the statements to you, then there is no public statement and therefore no defamation. There also can be no damage to your reputation if no one else knows about the statements.
If this person was a friend, you may want to deal with this as a personal problem. You could try talking to them, or having a mutual friend intervene on your behalf. Why did this friend say these things? Is there a way to repair the relationship or at least get this person to understand your point of view? If this person is not a friend, you may want to stop talking with them.
If this is a small matter and you just want to get them to stop, you could consider suing this person yourself in small claims court. You would have to sue them where they live. If you win, and they keep making these statements you can sue them again. They will eventually get the message. A letter from an attorney will get them to stop some of the time, but in your case it is hard to imagine that it would be worth the expense of paying an attorney to write a letter.See question
He sent the picture then I found out he is cheating on his spouse so I posted the picture of him (no face in picture) on social media then deleted it short after. He had evidence that I posted it though even after delete if it short after. Can any...
You said that you deleted it quickly, so I think you already know the answer. Yes of course you could get in trouble with the police and with him. A lot of the law is common sense. You should have thought before you acted. If you deleted the posts very quickly then it is possible you will not get in trouble. But you have just confessed to the actions on a public forum, which was also not a good idea, so it would be easy to prove what you did.
I wrote several posts on my blog about websites like yougotposted that publish nude pictures of people without their permission. I give a detailed review of the laws involved. If you want more information, please see my blog at http://marshall2law.com/.See question
On another question, a lawyer mentioned in passing about how, quote, "Recording a private conversation is a gross misdemeanor in Washington State. See RCW § 9.73.030." This is important for me to know. On occasion I have considered gettin...
In Washington it is illegal to audio record a private conversation without the permission of everyone being recorded (RCW 9.73 Privacy, Violating Right of, you can easily Google it). Generally you can not use such a recording in court and you can be charged with a crime for making the recording. But there must be some expectation of privacy. Oddly, it is generally not illegal to record video only. There are some exceptions, such as when the person being recorded has some expectation of privacy.
And there can be restrictions on how the recording is used. Defamation, invasion of privacy, false light, copyright and many other areas of law may come in to play.
You should consult an attorney who is familiar with this area of law, such as myself, and go over the specific facts of your case with that person if you want a more definitive answer.See question
I am making a significant website and mobile app for which I have the opportunity to buy EXAMPLE.com (where example is just a fill-in here). For our purposes of discussion, lets say that this website is a place to list cars for sale. The issue is ...
The answer is maybe. Trademark law is rather complex, and as with most legal questions, the answer is very fact specific. Whether there are similar federally registered marks is only one of many factors that can be relevant. There is no substitute for sitting down with an attorney and discussing your situation. That would be a wise move before investing in establishing a domain name and a brand name.See question
I am a manger of a big scale education project. As a part of a project, we create a lot of educational videos and they are to be released to public with open license. These videos are mainly PowerPoint slides with voice over. Each slide contains ...
unique facts. This is especially true when dealing with children. There are so many different legal aspects to deal with, as there should be. I disagree with the other commentator who says that there are no special rules when dealing with children. There are many.
Still it should be possible to come up with some general guidelines that will help reduce risk. Certainly getting written permission from the parents is always a good idea. Because every situation is unique, there is no substitute for you sitting down with an attorney familiar with this area of law, going over the specific facts of your case, and then obtaining legal advice that is customized to your situation.
I find that common sense goes a long way in the law. Would a typical parent, whether the parent of the child in the photograph or not, be likely to be offended by the use of the child’s likeness in the photograph? If the answer is yes or maybe, then you probably have a problem.
There is risk to anything you do. You will have to assess whether the risk of using photographs of children outweighs the benefits or not for your project.See question
if i have them recorded giving permission to be in my book is that enough or do i need to have them sign a form. If I use there name. If i need a form is it a simple signing they agree to be in my book
You do not have to get them to sign a written release form. But it is still a very good idea.
Most publishers will not publish your book unless you have written signed release forms. Even if you plan to self-publish now, you may want to go with a publishers later. By then it will be very difficult to track people down and get them to agree to sign a form.
What are they agreeing to? With just a general recorded statement, that may not be clear. Are you getting E-book rights? Can you use their quotes on the Internet? Is this permission for one small project, or may you reprint the book, or enter into an agreement with a publisher? What if someone wants to make a movie or a TV show about the book, can they? Can you paraphrase them. Can you print excepts from the quote without using the entire quote? What if the finished book is not the same as you represented to them that it would be. Can you still use their quotes? All this would be spelled out in a good release form.
You can find release forms online. But as with any legal form, it is better than nothing, but still not very good. It is designed to sort of work in all situations, rather than work well in any one situation. An experienced literary attorney such as myself would ask you what type of book you were planning, what other plans do you have for the quotes. Then I would draft an interview release form that fits your particular project. An interview release is not very complicated. This process would not take very long.
Another advantage to using a written form is that when you present it to people, someone may not want to sign it. That is a good thing. You have identified a potential problem early and had avoided it. Just do not use then in your book. That is a lot better than using them in your book and then having to deal with their lawyer later when they are upset with the results.See question
Her boyfriend has had a surveillance system installed on her house and intentionally aimed a camera at the entrance to my driveway, effectively monitoring my property. It is the only camera that does not cover some part of her home. Does a homeow...
The law is not clear on this issue It depends on what is being recorded and under what circumstances. There is no substitution to talking with an attorney about your specific case.
In Washington it is illegal to audio record a private conversation without the permission of everyone being recorded (RCW 9.73 Privacy, Violating Right of). But there must be some expectation of privacy. If the recording is say on a public street, then there is no expectation of privacy.
Oddly, it is generally not illegal to record video only. There are some exceptions, such as when the person being recorded has some expectation of privacy. And there can be restrictions on how the recording is used. Defamation, invasion of privacy, false light, copyright and many other areas of law may come in to play.
I am not aware of any law on the specific issue of a neighbor intentionally video taping the publically viewable areas of your property. It comes up often these days. I have talked to other attorneys about this. The general consensus is that it is probably not permissible. But there is no clear remedy. You could have an attorney write them a letter asking them to stop. If they do not stop, you could seek a court order prohibiting them from focusing the camera on your property. That is not a very practical solution but it might work.
Does anyone else on this list have a better idea?See question