Back to Search Results

Benjamin Jerauld Roesch

Benjamin Jerauld Roesch

8.3

Excellent

Experience 4.0 star rating
Industry Recognition 2.5 star rating
Professional Conduct 5.0 star rating

Find out more about the Avvo Rating

Client Ratings

Not yet reviewed
No professional misconduct found.

Overview

Practice Areas

  • 80% Insurance
    4 years
  • 20% Litigation
    4 years

Contact Information

  • Address registered with state bar
    1420 5th Ave Ste 4100
    Seattle, WA 98101
    View map

Languages

  • French

References

Client Reviews

How would you rate this lawyer?

If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?

Review this lawyer

Endorsements

Endorse a fellow lawyer, get more visits to your profile

In addition to providing a simple way to express your gratitude to fellow lawyers, any time you add an endorsement to a peer's profile, a link to your profile will appear on it.

Endorse this lawyer

Résumé

Licenses

  • 4 years since Benjamin Jerauld Roesch was first licensed to practice law in AK.
  • 2 years since Benjamin Jerauld Roesch was first licensed to practice law in WA.
  • 5 years since Benjamin Jerauld Roesch was first licensed to practice law in MN.

See license details


We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.

Work Experience

Position Duration
Associate at Lane Powell 2005–present
Legal Secondee at Markel International Insurance Company 2007–2008
See all 3 job entries

Education

School Major Degree Graduated
University of Michigan Law School Law JD - Juris Doctor 2004
University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire History BA - Bachelor of Arts 2001

Awards

Award Name Granting Organization Date
Order of the Coif University of Michigan Law School 2004

Portfolio

Publications

Article Publication Date
Money For Nothing? Unconditional Payments and Unjust Enrichment in Jackman v. Jewel Lake Villa One Alaska Law Review 2008
Erie Similarities: Alaska Civil Rule 68, “Direct Collisions,” and the Problem of Non-Aligning Background Assumptions Alaska Law Review 2006
See all 3 publications

Cases

Title:
Taylor v. Sentry Group of Companies
Practice Area:
Insurance
Outcome:
Successfully defended summary judgment.
Description:
After summary judgment for Sentry in the U.S. District Court, the plaintiff appealed his bad faith case to the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed.

See all cases