Expert Advice When You Need It Most

Back to Search Results

Nicholle Winters

Nicholle Winters
Experience 4.5 star rating
Industry Recognition 2.5 star rating
Professional Conduct 5.0 star rating

What is the Avvo Rating?

Client Reviews

Not yet reviewed
Former client? Write a review
No professional misconduct found.

Overview

Practice Areas
Chart?chs=124x124&cht=p&chp=4
  • 25% Intellectual Property
  • 25% Election Campaign / Political Law
  • 25% Antitrust / Trade Law
  • 25% Litigation

Contact Information
  • Perkins Coie
    1120 NW Couch 10th Flr
    10th Flr
    Portland, OR 97209
    Office: 503-727-2182
    Fax: 503-727-2222
    View map | Edit this address

References

Client Reviews

How would you rate this lawyer?

If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?

Review this lawyer

Peer Endorsements

Endorse a fellow lawyer, get more visits to your profile

In addition to providing a simple way to express your gratitude to fellow lawyers, any time you add an endorsement to a peer's profile, a link to your profile will appear on it.

Endorse this lawyer

Résumé

 

License

7 years since Nicholle Winters was first licensed to practice law.

State License status Year acquired Last updated by Avvo
Oregon Active 2005 04/27/2012
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.

Education
School Major Degree Graduated
Columbia University School of Law Law JD - Juris Doctor 2005
University of California - Los Angeles BA - Bachelor of Arts 1992

Awards
Award Name Granting Organization Date
Rising Star Oregon Super Lawyers 2009

Associations
Position Association Name Duration
Member Oregon Women Lawyers Association 2006-2009
Member Multnomah Bar Association, Young Lawyers Section 2005-2009
See all 4 association entries

Portfolio

Publications
Article Publication Date
Trial Practice Ch.24 Federal Civil Litigation in Oregon 2009
Carbon Dioxide: A Pollutant in the Air, but is the EPA Correct that it is not an 'Air Pollutant'? Columbia Law Review 2004