Skip to main content
Kevin Elliott Parks

Kevin Parks’s Answers

698 total


  • Did he follow the legal steps of giving notice, or does he need to start over? Shouldn't we at least have 60 days?

    my landlord served me a 30 day notice, 2 days before my lease of one year was up. He wanted me to sign the notice, but i wouldn't before i found out my rights. He then posted it to my door, but never sent anything in the mail or anything like tha...

    Kevin’s Answer

    It's not illegal, in and of itself, to give you any notice. The question is what you'd like to do in response to the notice you received, and what your landlord may do.

    If your landlord attempts to file an eviction complaint against you on the basis of the 30 day notice, it's likely that they may have problems concerning the adequacy of the notice itself (30 vs. 60 days), and the service of the notice (not mailing a copy). If the landlord does file an eviction, it's likely that a landlord/tenant attorney would provide you a free consultation, as well as likely represent your defense of the action on a contingency fee basis.

    That said, you may well want some certainty if you're planning to siply stay past the expiration on the notice itself, and thus you'll likely want to hire an attorney now to review the case and provide you specific advice on the various risks associated with different potential courses of action.

    Additionally, there remains some question of what happens at the end of your 1 year lease (whether it terminates and expires, or converts to a month-to-month, etc.) and also whether posting a notice is even allowable in the first place.

    See question 
  • Personal Injury attorney is requesting a new contract agreement after court case is done. Required to enter it? Hinder collect?

    I hired a personal injury attorney on a contingent fee agreement contract for a Battery Tort case. The contract said 40% attorney fees for trial. 50% for appeal. My case went to trial and won which included court costs added to the judement. The t...

    Kevin’s Answer

    This dynamic is extremely common, as collecting on a judgment from anyone or anything other than an insured party's covered insurance policy is entirely different (and occasionally significantly more difficult) than merely winning a judgment in the first place.

    What you can do, and what you should do, ultimately depend on the details of your case, including the specifics of your contingency fee agreement with your attorney, whether the judgment included attorneys fees (and thus whether any supplemental judgments may be able to be filed to include additional attorneys fees), the likelihood of collection, the potential costs involved in executing the judgment, and the viability of your alternatives.

    You're certainly not required to enter into a new contract with your attorney. But at the same time, your attorney isn't likely required to continue to spend time and/or out-of-pocket costs in attempting to collect the judgment for you (or for you both).

    Some personal injury attorneys are well-versed in post-judgment collection work, while others might not be. You could likely hire a new lawyer who frequently and/or primarily does collection work to assist you, but then you'd be starting from scratch with a new lawyer, with new costs, and you'd likely still owe your previous lawyer 40% of whatever you might be able to collect.

    See question 
  • Can my dad go onto a property owned by him and my mother when she says he cannot and has mailed him a notarized paper saying so?

    My parents got divorced while my dad was in prison and my mom says he cannot go onto the property without her permission. The notarized letter she sent is all she has done other than make a formal complaint to the police. There is no restraining o...

    Kevin’s Answer

    Without knowing what the notarized letter said (and what legal basis it may assert), it's impossible to analyze what your father's legal rights are and simply whether or not he can go onto the property.

    There are a number of ways in which a person can be prevented from going onto a specific property -- the questions are who can prevent them, how they can prevent them, and what could be the recourse should they go onto the property anyway.

    The first issue is criminal liability -- i.e., criminal trespassing (breaking and entering, etc.), or violating a restraining order, or parole, or the like. This doesn't appear to be applicable in this situation, though I'd certainly want to double-check everything before being confident.

    Secondly, then, is civil liability. This is a very nuanced area of law. A property owner can sue someone for trespass, or a tenant can sue a landlord for unauthorized access, or coming onto the property could potentially satisfy another element of some other individual tort, thus creating possible financial liability.

    A thorough review of all of the relevant documentation is likely necessary to fully understand what's going on here, and thus what you father's rights are. These documents include the notarized letter itself, likely along with the divorce decree, a current title report, any lease with the current tenants, the foreclosure pleadings (and judgment, specifically) with the financial lender, and any related writs of enforcement.

    See question 
  • When terminated from employment and you have p.t.o, owed to you, is it required the employer pay this out upon termination?

    I had 80 hours of paid time off still owed to me on date I was terminated.

    Kevin’s Answer

    As my colleagues have advised, your company's employee handbook, manual, or policy documents will provide clarification on whether or not such payment is due upon termination.

    Your best bet is to schedule a consult with an employee-side employment lawyer to sit down with you, review the facts of your case (i.e., specifics regarding your termination, payment history, policies, etc.) and determine the best course of action with you. There may well be specific language which precludes you from collecting the unpaid time off, but just as likely there may well be legal arguments available to you which would enable you to collect these wage -- possibly in addition to penalty wages, as well as costs and lawyer fees should you ultimately need to initiate litigation.

    See question 
  • How do I fight a 30day no cause when it has to do with a stalker .

    I asked my rental management for assistance removing a friend who unknowingly moved her belongings into my home and refused to leave. My manager informed me she could not help. Myself and r help of my neighbors removed her belongings. And had no...

    Kevin’s Answer

    You certainly have potential claims for damages against the individual trespasser, though it's unclear whether bringing such claims would be viable and/or cost effective.

    Then, in defense of the 30 Day No Cause termination notice, you can continue to try to negotiate to get your landlord to rescind it before the deadline, but it's seemingly unlikely that that will happen. If you opt to disregard the notice and stay beyond the deadline, the landlord will be required to pursue an eviction case against you in court. There, you have the right to defend yourself by explaining the situation and asserting that the landlord's eviction proceeding is illegal. Whether or not your situation presents an adequate legal basis to assert such a defense successfully, however, is a risky proposition both legally, practically, and financially.

    Your best bet at this point is likely to retain a lawyer to communicate with your landlord on your behalf and attempt to curb the landlord's enforcement of the Termination Notice.

    See question 
  • What legal advice would be advised regarding PTA membership?

    My wife served as VP all last year. Last fall she was elected President for this year. The retiring president contacted her and said she would prefer if my wife stepped down and let someone else be president. My did not step down. This ...

    Kevin’s Answer

    It sounds like this is an internal power play by the out-going leadership, no different than most intra-company or intra-organizational politicking.

    It's impossible to say whether or not your wife may have viable claims such as defamation (libel, slander) without knowing all of the specific facts. Generally speaking, based on what you've presented, I'd guess is that the likelihood is that such a case would be a significant uphill battle.

    Beyond that the possibility of bringing a tort claim against the PTA and/or outgoing President, then, it's difficult to advise your wife as to what to do without knowing specifically what the entire set of facts are. Certainly, there are some remaining questions that don't have specific answers (i.e., what are the PTA's policies [elections, dues payments, etc] that they're relying on, what is the President's authority to ask for a recall, what are the internal procedures for disputing such a claim, did she actually pay the dues, can you find the endorsed check, who conducted the audit and why, etc.).

    You'd be best advised to gather as much information and documentation as you can about the situation and see an attorney, who will be able to help you fully analyze the situation (practically and legally) and lay out your various options in moving forward, including litigation and/or otherwise. It may well be that a letter to the President and/or leadership of the PTA -- or the membership as a whole -- can right the ship, so to speak.

    See question 
  • What should I do if I've been disputing a debt with a company, but they send it to collections?

    I've seen online the idea to send a validation letter to the collection agency, but if the company insists the debt is valid, won't the CA insist the debt is valid? Is it worth the effort to explain to the CA why I don't owe the debt? Ba...

    Kevin’s Answer

    At this point, you can continue to dispute the debt with the alleged originating creditor, you can dispute the debt with the collections agency, and you can potentially dispute the debt with the credit bureaus, if it shows up on your reports and affects your credit score. That said, you're not likely to get very far, or have much success, in attempting to utilize this process alone.

    Substantively, you're likely going to have to make a choice -- either proactively sue them, or you can wait for them to sue you and potentially defend and/or counter-claim against them.

    It's likely than an initial consultation with an attorney would be able to help you analyze the strength and weakness of your defense to their claims, as well as the potential for asserting your own claims and/or counter-claims.

    See question 
  • Cars burnt out

    Hi...my car was parked next to other car which been burnt out caused by electrical problems..the fire caught my car as well and its also burnt out...neither me nor other guy has insurance and want to know how i can handel it?

    Kevin’s Answer

    I agree with my colleague, Ms. Thorpe.

    The monetary damages that stem from this incident are clear: i.e., the value of your car, replacement, other personal items inside, etc. Your ability to prove legal liability on behalf of the other owner, however, isn't clear at all. A negligence claim is likely your best bet, but it's unclear whether there is a known duty that the other driver breached in relation to maintenance of his vehicle. (Further, it's unclear how a parked vehicle might have caught fire in any event.) You certainly have the right to try to hold the other driver legally accountable, and it's possible that you may be able to prove such liability; however, you're likely looking at a variety of upfront costs in getting there, including not only attorneys fees (if you choose to hire an attorney) but court costs, filing costs, depositions and discovery, and likely expert costs (i.e., fire analysis, etc.). You can potentially get your costs and fees included in a judgment against the other party; however, that doesn't even contemplate your ability to collect on any monetary damage judgment that you may be able to get against the other driver in court (or, likely, arbitration). Without the other car owner having insurance, you're going to have to go after their personal assets, which is always a dicey and difficult proposition.

    All told, this situation is exactly the type of issue that a comprehensive insurance policy is intended to cover. Without such a policy -- or without any policy whatsoever -- you're certainly looking at an uphill battle to be made whole, which may or may not make economic sense.

    See question 
  • Do I have to answer a summons that was served to me from an incorrect county?

    the summons, for a cc debt that was served to me was for a different county than I live in and didn't live in when I entered into a contract for that credit card. in the complaint, "plaintiff is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that de...

    Kevin’s Answer

    Regardless of what your defenses and/or counter-claims to the suit might be, you risk having a default judgment entered against you if you do not act in at least some manner or another -- whether by answer, by settlement negotiation, or by filing a motion of some kind. Advice as to what specific document you should file -- as well as where, and by when -- should be obtained in consultation with an attorney who can review all of the attendant facts and provide you with an evaluation of your various options.

    Your options could well, amongst other things, entail objecting to the venue of the action and/or potentially transferring the action to a venue more convenient to you.

    See question 
  • I am an exotic dancer but considered an independent contractor. My employer is is saying I cannot drink unless I give my keys

    Is this legal without contract? Also they are segregating certain girls who must give there keys up once starting there shift. Once again no contract has been signed stating a no alcohol clause. Is this leg all?

    Kevin’s Answer

    Mr. Schuck provides great insight and analysis as to the breadth of your potential rights, recourse and claims. Whether you're properly classified as a contractor is indeed the key question.

    Beyond that, then, the specifics of your question regarding the company's drinking/keys policy is nevertheless complex. Namely, understanding the rationale behind the club's policy of segregating dancers into groups where the policy does and does not apply, is ultimately the issue.

    Certainly, a bar has the right to refuse to serve anyone for any legal reason, and they have an interest in mitigating their potential liability and damages -- including from possible dram shop cases should you get into an accident or the like on the way home from the bar/club. Whether or not such a policy is actually written into an actual physical contract with you, however, likely has little-to-no significant bearing either way. The

    See question