Bruce C Hamlin

Bruce C Hamlin

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 46 years

Litigation Lawyer at Portland, OR
Practice Areas: Litigation, Business

601 S.W. Second Ave. Ste. 2100, Suite 900, Portland, OR

About Bruce

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 15 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2010

Voluntarily Resigned

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 46 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 1979

Retired

No misconduct found

Location

Lane Powell PC

601 S.W. Second Ave. Ste. 2100, Suite 900, Portland, OR, 97204

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Bruce C Hamlin's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Bruce C Hamlin's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Bruce

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2016

The Best Lawyers in America®, Product Liability Litigation, Best Lawyers

2016

Oregon Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

2015

The Best Lawyers in America®, Product Liability Litigation, Best Lawyers

2015

Oregon Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

2014

The Best Lawyers in America®, Product Liability Litigation, Best Lawyers

2014

Oregon Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

2013

The Best Lawyers in America®, Product Liability Litigation, Best Lawyers

2013

Oregon Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

2012

The Best Lawyers in America®, Product Liability Litigation, Best Lawyers

2012

Oregon Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

2011

The Best Lawyers in America®, Product Liability Litigation, Best Lawyers

2011

Oregon Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

2010

The Best Lawyers in America®, Product Liability Litigation, Best Lawyers

2010

Oregon Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

2009

Oregon Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

Work Experience

2016 - Present

Of Counsel, Lane Powell PC

2015 - 2015

Senior Partner, Martin, Bischoff, Templeton, Langslet & Hoffman, LLP

2009 - 2015

Partner, Martin, Bischoff, Templeton, Langslet & Hoffman, LLP

1979 - 2009

Shareholder, Lane Powell PC

Associations

2005 - Present

Product Liability Advisory Council

Sustaining Member

Oregon Association of Defense Counsel

Member

Multnomah Bar Association

Member

2011 - 2015

Oregon Association of Defense Counsel

Articles Editors

2009 - 2010

Oregon Association of Defense Counsel, Government Affairs Committee

Member

2008 - 2008

Oregon State Bar Association, Products Liability Section

Chair

2005 - 2006

Oregon State Bar Association, Electronic Filing Task Force

Member

2004 - 2006

Oregon Association of Defense Counsel

Board of Directors

2004 - 2004

Oregon State Bar, Civil Jury Instruction Committee

Chair

2003 - 2009

Oregon State Bar, Executive Committee

Member

1998 - 1999

Council on Court Procedures

Chair

1992 - 1993

Multnomah Bar Association, Judicial Selection Committee

Chair

1991 - 1994

Oregon State Bar Association, Legal Ethics Committee

Member

1987 - 1988

Volunteer Lawyers Project

President

Sample of Legal Cases

Supervised nationwide litigation involving allegedly defective roofing material installed on roofs

Recovered more than $200 million for companies insured by Oregon’s state workers’ compensation carrier

Obtained summary judgment for web press seller against claims of serious injury

Defended tire manufacturer against wrongful death claim based on alleged design and manufacturing defects

Obtained summary judgment for chassis manufacturer against wrongful death claim based on alleged design defects

Defended lessor of rotary hammer against claims based on alleged failures to maintain and to warn

Defended window manufacturer against claims based on alleged design defects and failure to warn

Defended RV manufacturer in wrongful death claim alleging that vehicle was not crashworthy

See More Legal Cases

Education

1979

University of Oregon School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1976

Whitman College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Publications

2014

Defense Research Institute Writing a Reservation of Rights: A North American Compendium

2014

Oregon State Bar’s Oregon Statutory Time Limitations Guide Personal Injury and Property Damage

2005

Oregon State Bar Products Liability Section Newsletter Product Liability Law: Comparing the Approach in Oregon and Washington

2005

Aspen Publishers Tort Law Desk Reference — A Fifty-State Compendium

2004

Oregon State Bar Products Liability Section Newsletter Admissible Evidence of ‘Consumer Expectations

2002

Oregon Association of Defense Counsel Newsletter Do We Truly ‘Exchange Courtrooms’ When Trying State Punitive Damages Claims in Federal Court?

2000

I Torts, Chapter 8, Oregon State Bar Continuing Legal Education Joint Tort Feasors

2000

I Civil Pleading Practice, Chapter 13, Oregon State Bar Continuing Legal Education Third Party Practice

2000

Ethical Oregon Lawyer, Oregon State Bar Continuing Legal Education Limitations on Lawyer's Duty to Client--Litigation

1989

Oregon State Bar Connections Newsletter Other Limitations on the Lawyer’s Duties to a Client — Litigation
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution