Rodney Langford Eshelman

Rodney Langford Eshelman

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.5

Licensed for 56 years

Defective and dangerous products Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Defective and Dangerous Products, Insurance, Environmental and Natural Resources

44 Montgomery Street Suite 400, San Francisco, CA

About Rodney

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 52 years

State: California

Acquired: 1974

Inactive

No misconduct found

Licensed in Iowa for 56 years

State: Iowa

Acquired: 1970

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Carroll, Burdick & McDonough LLP

44 Montgomery Street Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94104

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Rodney Langford Eshelman's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Rodney Langford Eshelman's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Rodney

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.5 (Excellent)

Honors

2006

Northern California Super Lawyer,

2006

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2005

Northern California Super Lawyer,

2005

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2004

Northern California Super Lawyer,

2004

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

Associations

State Bar of California

Member

2000 - 2000

Environmental Coverage Subcommittee

Co-Chair

Education

N/A

Duke University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

N/A

Dartmouth College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Publications

2006

Mealey's Publications Who Is the Sole Survivor? A Corporate Successor's Right to Insurance Coverage

2006

Section on Litigation, Committee on Insurance Coverage Litigation The Effect of Venue Differences in Bad Faith Cases: The Good (Law), the Bad (Faith), and the Ugly (Truth)

2002

Mealey's Publications Latching on: Asbestos Channeling Injunctions Should Protect All Settling Insurers, Regardless of Whether They Settle Before or After Plan Confirmation

2000

San Francisco Daily Journal Unfair Share-Liability Based on Market Presence is Not Strong Enough to Carry Lead Paint

2000

For The Defense (DRI, Defense Research Institute) Why Market Share Doesn't Add Up

1999

For The Defense (DRI, Defense Research Institute) Speculative Damages and Toxic Torts: Good Intentions Make Bad Law

1998

Unknown First Party Environmental Coverage Exclusions

1997

Expert Evidence, A Practitioner's Guide to Law, Science and the FJC Manual contributing author

1995

Andrews Repetitive Stress Injury Litigation Reporter RSI: Mass Tort Or Much Ado About Nothing

1995

California Litigation Non-Scientific Expert Testimony: Who is Watching the Gate in California?

1992

California Litigation Using Spoliation of Evidence in Products Liability Cases
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution