Skip to main content
James Juo

James Juo’s Legal Cases

8 total

  • Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. SciMed Life Systems, Inc.

    Practice Area:
    Patent Infringement
    Date:
    Aug 06, 2001
    Outcome:
    Favorable Appellate Decision
    Description:
    Winning reversal of adverse claim construction to vacate summary judgment
  • Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

    Practice Area:
    Patent Infringement
    Date:
    Apr 20, 2001
    Outcome:
    Favorable appellate decision
    Description:
    Winning affirmance of favorable district court decision
  • Origin Medsystems, Inc. v. General Surgical Innovations, Inc.

    Practice Area:
    Patent Infringement
    Date:
    Jul 16, 1999
    Outcome:
    Favorable appellate decision
    Description:
    Successfully overturned adverse summary judgment decision.
  • ACCO Brands USA, LLC v. Accentra, Inc.

    Practice Area:
    Patent Infringement
    Date:
    May 13, 2008
    Outcome:
    Dismissal
    Description:
    Winning dismissal of declaratory judgment filed against Accentra, Inc. and WorkTools, Inc.
  • Coach, Inc. v. Asia Pacific Trading Co.

    Practice Area:
    Trademark Infringement
    Date:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Outcome:
    Summary judgment
    Description:
    Winning summary judgment of no liability for defendant Mirage Eyewear
  • Cordelia Lighting, Inc. v. American Fluorescent Corp.

    Practice Area:
    Patent Infringement
    Date:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Outcome:
    Favorable settlement and dismissal
    Description:
    Plaintiffs filed for declaratory judgment that U.S. Patent 5,872,431 was invalid and not infringed. All of the claims in the patent were eventually canceled during reexamination at USPTO.
  • Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

    Practice Area:
    Patent Infringement
    Date:
    Jan 12, 2000
    Outcome:
    Judgment in favor of Defendant
    Description:
    Pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, motion for directed verdict of no infringement was granted because the court found that, as a matter of law, there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis upon which a jury could find that the accused device infringed Medtronic's patent.
  • San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Elkay Plastics Co.

    Practice Area:
    Patent Application
    Date:
    Apr 15, 2011
    Outcome:
    Dismissed with prejudice
    Description:
    Winning motion to dismiss false marking claim against Elkay Plastics