Skip to main content
Patrick S Sampair
Avvo
Pro

Patrick Sampair’s Legal Cases

9 total

  • Wright vs Wright (Appeals Case)

    Practice Area:
    Appeals
    Date:
    Feb 09, 2012
    Outcome:
    Won
    Description:
    Division of assets excluded from divorce decree.
  • Kroll vs. Kroll

    Practice Area:
    Child Support
    Date:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Outcome:
    Judge ruled that father's income was actually $21,498 mo., causing C/S to go from $1759 per month to $3198 per month. Father also ordered to pay $400 month towards arrearage. Also obtained judgment against father for mother’s attorney’s fees.
    Description:
    Father is self-employed contractor. Child support was initially set by divorce judge in 2009 based on father having $6500 month income. In July, 2010, Father filed subsequent petition to modify child support, claiming his income had been reduced to $3500 month. We subpoenaed his bank records directly from the bank. Presented new information to the Judge and obtained Order for forensic accounting of father by CPA at father's expense.
  • US v. Bilecki

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Jun 23, 1989
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    Challenge district court refusal to grant new trial where improper venireman served on jury in place of proper member
  • US v. Bilecki

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Jun 23, 1989
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    Challenge district court refusal to grant new trial where improper venireman served on jury in place of proper member
  • US v Waldeck

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Jul 12, 1990
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    Evading Assesment of taxes as opposed to evading payment of taxes. Improper jury instruction
  • Kennedy v Kennedy

    Practice Area:
    Divorce & Separation
    Date:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Outcome:
    reversed in part
    Description:
    Whether appropriate to grant Summary Judgment on issue of forgery of signature on quitclaim deed on house
  • Bay v Bay

    Practice Area:
    Divorce & Separation
    Date:
    Jul 01, 2010
    Outcome:
    vacate and remand
    Description:
    Whether award of equalization payment was appropriate
  • Us v Pensyl

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Outcome:
    affirmed
    Description:
    Questioned jury instruction on good faith belief versus willful ingorance of the law
  • Eaker v Eaker

    Practice Area:
    Child Custody
    Date:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Outcome:
    Joint Legal Decision-making, equal parenting time with Father. Mother warned not to violate further orders or possibly lose parenting time
    Description:
    Mother engaged in significant alienation of children from Father. Refused to allow Father court-ordered parenting time. Mother sought sole-legal decision-making.