480-840-3138
Ronald is right. I am a bankruptcy attorney in Gilbert, Arizona and your wages cannot be garnished here without first obtaining a judgment against you and then seeking garnishment after the judgment. I also represent creditors from time to time. The maximum that can be garnished is 25% but the court has discretion to go lower if you give reason for it to do so. Often, the creditor will be happy to accept the 15% garnishment without requiring a hearing on it, too.
24 people marked this answer as helpful
When you received the summons, you should have also received a complaint. The complaint will tell you what they are suing you for. In your response, you can merely deny that you owe the debt and force them to prove the debt or you can admit that you owe something but that you dispute the amount. In most cases, I would advise a general denial and have them prove the amount of the debt and that you are the correct people to sue.
10 people marked this answer as helpful
My colleague is correct in that your rights are normally limited to visitation only. However, he is also correct that you can file a motion to get custody of the child in extreme situations where the child's best interests are in the child being removed from their current living situation. Based on what you have described, it is possible that the situation with the boyfriend and her unstable actions may help satisfy this requirement. This is not an easy task, however, and you should contact a...
Selected as best answer
Has the court made a ruling regarding custody and paternity yet? Or is the case still active? If you are still in the middle of the litigation you can file what is called a Motion for Temporary Orders, which would determine custody, parenting time, child support, etc, for the time period between filing the Motion and when the Court reaches a ruling on the actual overarching case. As these Motions are very fact intensive and complicated, I recommend you consult with a local family law attorney.
4 lawyers agreed with this answer
1 person marked this answer as helpful
Sounds like you need to be married again. I wouldn't worry at all about the polygamy issue, your second marriage is void and no one is going to come after you for a mistake. You may want to consider a prenuptial agreement in your case, too, to convert the assets and debts you have acquired in the last five years into community property and debts. By doing so, you will essentially be in the same legal position as you would have been if the first marriage was valid. The real problem is...
Selected as best answer
They can do both at the same time. Of course, in order to garnish, they need to know who the employer is and, in order to levy the bank account, they need to know what bank you bank at. If they know both, they can and may do both.
Selected as best answer
Generally the court will balance the non-moving parent's right to parent and be with their child, against your right to live where you want to, while considering the best interests of the child. Relocation cases are difficult to win, absent the agreement of the non-moving parent, because it is difficult to maintain the child's relationship with the non-moving parent when the distance between the child and that parent is so great. Is the Father currently seeing the child for any amount of time...
3 lawyers agreed with this answer
My colleague is correct in that terminating his rights in this situation would require a showing of abandonment, etc. However, if what you are seeking is merely sole (legal) custody - and I assume little or no parenting time for him - this can be done in the family court during the divorce proceeding. Termination of parental rights would be more useful to you in situations where your new spouse wants to adopt your child from a prior relationship. As you haven't stated that is the case, you...
3 lawyers agreed with this answer
You should consult a local bankruptcy attorney as soon as possible; most offer free consultations that will give you an idea of the cost to file your adversary complaint, and to litigate it further if necessary.
3 lawyers agreed with this answer
I am a bankruptcy attorney here in Arizona and this is an extremely common question here. Arizona is an anti-deficiency state and our state statutes prevent the creditors from coming after homeowners in the event of a foreclosure. Since the creditors have no recourse for the deficiency in our state, there is no forgiveness of debt income. Another option you might be able to consider is to strip off any junior liens in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. If you have a first mortgage and a junior...
1 lawyer agreed with this answer
4 people marked this answer as helpful