Case Conclusion Date: July 18, 2008
Practice Area: Appeals
Outcome: Court of Appeals reversed trial court
Description: The plaintiffs sued the defendant, represented on appeal by Mr. Parsley, for alleged fraud related to a residential construction project. The court of appeals, based on Parsley's brief for the defendant, held that the trial court erred in rendering a fraud judgment for the plaintiffs because the plaintiffs did not present any evidence that the defendant made a misrepresentation to them.