Skip to main content
Alexander M. Ivakhnenko

Alexander Ivakhnenko’s Legal Cases

39 total

  • Barbara Gruttier, Petitioner v. Lee Bollinger

    Practice Area:
    Constitutional
    Date:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Outcome:
    the affirmative action admissions policy upheld
    Description:
    participated in legal support of the amici curiae brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in the above case.
  • US Immigration Court Removal proceedings

    Practice Area:
    Immigration
    Date:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Outcome:
    Successfully gained refugee status after the federal court hearing
    Description:
    A Kyrgyz national sought asylum under the legal principles of a membership in a particular social group to which the client belonged.
  • In the Matter of S. F

    Practice Area:
    Immigration
    Date:
    Oct 22, 2012
    Outcome:
    The client received Lawful Permanent Card
    Description:
    Granted Cancellation of Removal gave an immediate relief for Permanent Lawful Residence which was submitted for processing.
  • In the Matter of M.G.

    Practice Area:
    Immigration
    Date:
    Oct 23, 2012
    Outcome:
    LPR granted
    Description:
    An undocumneted alien with lost I-94 sought AOS after marrying a USC.
  • In the Matter of M.Y

    Practice Area:
    Immigration
    Date:
    Sep 06, 2013
    Outcome:
    the IJ adjusted Respondent to LPR upon approved AOS Petition
    Description:
    Respondent received a final order of deportation in the fall of 2010 after IJ did not find grounds for asylum. Respondent timely appealed on procedural errors to the BIA. In the fall of 2011, the BIA remanded the case back to IJ, IJ corrected procedural flaws and issued a second final odrer of deportation. Respondent filed a timely second BIA appeal on valid grounds. While the second BIA appeal was pending Respondent became eligible to AOS after approved I-130 Petition. Respondent filed a Motion to Terminate the proceedings and remand to Court for eligible AOS. in Nov. 2012 the BIA remanded pending case to IJ for eligible AOS on merits. The IJ terminated the proceedings and permitted Respondent to file for AOS. the USCIS approved AOS and deferred its jurisdiction to court for the decision.
  • People of the State of Illinois v. R.S

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Aug 17, 2012
    Outcome:
    Case dismissed.
    Description:
    Second charge of solicitation of prostitution after Chicago Police Department sting operation. Police Report revealed many flaws and discrepancies with respect to the client.
  • People of Illinois v. N.S.

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Outcome:
    Dismissed. Driving Permit granted
    Description:
    A case of alleged document fraud dismissed, subsequent suspension of driving privileges in the State of Illinois relieved by granted driving permit.
  • People of Illinois v. T.Y

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Nov 22, 2012
    Outcome:
    case dismissed, arrest eligible to expunge, car fine rescinded
    Description:
    A Misdemeanor Class A charge of solicitation of a prostitute during a CPD Vice Squad sting operation with a personal vehicle towed and a mandatory $2,000 fine added.
  • The City of Chicago v. X Auto LLC

    Practice Area:
    Constitutional
    Date:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Outcome:
    The case was dismissed with all fines and costs overturned, all vehicles returned to the owners.
    Description:
    An out of state dealer representative in Chicago had five dealership vehicles towed by the Chicago for allegations of tempered plates under a suspision of drug trafficking. The City transported the seized vehicles into an auto pound incurring storage fees and fines for two weeks.
  • in the Matter of M.M.

    Practice Area:
    Immigration
    Date:
    Feb 19, 2013
    Outcome:
    Naturalization approved
    Description:
    Naturalization application filed with all the required naturalization particulars and bona fides. In addition the attorney strongly urged the client to address the civil component of the naturalization preparation and repeatedly reviewed the client's level of preparation.