Back to Search Results

Harold Douglas Laycock

No photo

8.1

Excellent

Experience 4.5 star rating
Industry Recognition 2.5 star rating
Professional Conduct 5.0 star rating

Find out more about the Avvo Rating

Client Ratings

Not yet reviewed
No professional misconduct found.

Overview

Contact Information

  • Address registered with state bar
    625 S State St
    Ann Arbor, MI 48109
    Office: 734-647-●●●● - show
    View map

References

Client Reviews

How would you rate this lawyer?

If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?

Review this lawyer

Endorsements

Endorse a fellow lawyer, get more visits to your profile

In addition to providing a simple way to express your gratitude to fellow lawyers, any time you add an endorsement to a peer's profile, a link to your profile will appear on it.

Endorse this lawyer

Résumé

Licenses

  • 35 years since Harold Douglas Laycock was first licensed to practice law in TX.
  • 2 years since Harold Douglas Laycock was first licensed to practice law in MI.
  • 36 years since Harold Douglas Laycock was first licensed to practice law in IL.

See license details


We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.

Work Experience

Position Duration
Yale Kamisar Collegiate Professor of Law at University of Michigan Law School 2006–present
Alice McKean Young Regents Professor of Law at University of Texas Law School 1981–2006
See all 4 job entries

Awards

Award Name Granting Organization Date
Civitatis Award University of Texas at Austin 2005
Texas Civil Libertarian of the Year Texas American Civil Liberties Union 2000
See all 3 awards

Associations

Position Association Name Duration
Second Vice President, Council Member, Exec Comm American Law Institute 1983–present
Fellow American Academy of Arts & Sciences 1998–present

Portfolio

Cases

Title:
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
Practice Area:
Constitutional
Outcome:
Won in Supreme Court 6-3
Description:
Plaintiffs objected to school sponsored prayer at beginning of high school football games. School claimed it was student free speech and it was not...

See all cases