Cincinnati, OH
DUI and DWI Lawyer at Cincinnati, OH
Practice Areas: DUI & DWI, Criminal Defense
OUTCOME: Ohio Supreme Court unanimous decision 7-0
In a unanimous decision, the Ohio Supreme Court allowed a challenge to Daniel Ilg’s breath-alcohol test results. http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2014/2014-Ohio-4258.pdf
OUTCOME: Our motion and appeal were granted, suspension terminated, client receives valid Ohio driver's license.
Client charged with traveling left of center and DUI. Breath alcohol level is .185. Client's license was administratively suspended by the Ohio BMV for blowing above .08 BAC. We appeal the suspensio ... n for neglecting to follow the rules of the Ohio implied consent law failing to articulate reasonable grounds for the arrest in violation of her due process rights.
OUTCOME: Motion to Suppress Granted in Full, Case Dismissed
Client charged with improper backing and DUI, made incriminating admissions of consumption but did not submit to field or breath tests. Filed motion to suppress challenging the legality of the stop an ... d the arrest.
OUTCOME: Finding of Not Guilty
Charged with DUI and submitted to the field sobriety testing, made incriminating admissions, but refused the chemical test. The DVD showed the client looked reasonably well in performing the field tes ... ts on a hill.
OUTCOME: DUI charge amended to reckless operation, all other charges dismissed. Administrative license suspension for refusing chemical test is terminated. No court suspension which preserved his commercial driver's license.
Client hits cop car, chargeed with an assured clear distance violation, leaving the scene of an accident, charged with DUI and refuses breath test, cops find loaded firearm in car and charge him with i ... mproper handling of a firearm while intoxicated.
OUTCOME: Court of Appeals rules in favor of client.
Client charged with speeding and DUI and blows a .195. Counsel files public records request instead of a demand for discovery through the prosecutor. Prosecutor upset and files a demand for discovery ... on defense counsel claiming the public records request was circumventing the discovery rules and that the state was entitled to discovery from the defendant. Trial court agreed with prosecutor, and counsel immediately appealed while DUI case was pending. Hamilton County Court of Appeals agreed with defense counsel and reversed the trial court concluding that a public records request does not trigger discovery. Case currently in the Ohio Supreme Court.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
