Skip to main content
Stuart M. Address
Avvo
Pro

Stuart Address’s Legal Cases

51 total


  • Barkley v. Davis

    Practice Area:
    Civil Rights
    Date:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Outcome:
    Defense verdict
    Description:
    Excessive force against plaintiffs involving use of stun gun
  • Mathews v. Crosby

    Practice Area:
    Civil Rights
    Outcome:
    Settlement
    Description:
    Civil rights for inmate arising out of excessive force by corrections officers
  • Valdes v. Crosby

    Practice Area:
    Civil Rights
    Outcome:
    Settlement
    Description:
    Civil rights case for excessive force by corrections officers resulting in death of inmate.
  • McCloud v. Fortune

    Practice Area:
    Civil Rights
    Outcome:
    Plaintiff's verdict
    Description:
    Unlawful search and seizure, excessive force, racial discrimination
  • Akerley v. Francis

    Practice Area:
    Libel & Slander
    Outcome:
    Plaintiff's verdict at trial plus punitive damages
    Description:
    Slander case by former school employee against student and mother from school
  • Mason v. Rubin

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Outcome:
    Defense verdict
    Description:
    Suit regarding default on mortgage; favorable verdict after trial and appeal plus attorneys fees
  • American Banner Corporation v. Oliver

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Outcome:
    Summary Judgment in favor
    Description:
    civil litigation involving breach of contract
  • Myers v. Southland

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Outcome:
    Plaintiff's verdict
    Description:
    Plaintiff assaulted by employee of 7-11 store; employee and Southland, owner of 7-11 were sued
  • Armstrong v. Valliere

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Outcome:
    Defense Verdict
    Description:
    Plaintiff and others sued elected county commissioner alleging that she did not qualify for seat based upon lack of residency within the district for which she was elected
  • State of New Jersey v. Karen Steagle

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Outcome:
    Defendant
    Description:
    Bench trial assigned for pro bono defense of criminal defendant charged with violation of restraining order and battery; battery charge decided in favor of defendant after bench trial; violation of restraining order decided against defendant after bench trial sentenced to time served