Back to Search Results

Stephen E Nagin

No photo

7.7

Very Good

Experience 4.0 star rating
Industry Recognition 2.0 star rating
Professional Conduct 5.0 star rating

Find out more about the Avvo Rating

Client Ratings

Not yet reviewed
No professional misconduct found.

Overview

Practice Areas

  • 50% Antitrust / Trade Law
  • 50% Intellectual Property

Contact Information

  • Law Office of Stephen Nagin
    7929 SW 52 Avenue
    Miami, FL 33143
    Mobile: 305-527-●●●● - show
    View map

References

Client Reviews

How would you rate this lawyer?

If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?

Review this lawyer

Endorsements

Endorse a fellow lawyer, get more visits to your profile

In addition to providing a simple way to express your gratitude to fellow lawyers, any time you add an endorsement to a peer's profile, a link to your profile will appear on it.

Endorse this lawyer

Résumé

Licenses

  • 35 years since Stephen E Nagin was first licensed to practice law in FL.
  • 33 years since Stephen E Nagin was first licensed to practice law in DC.

See license details


We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.

Work Experience

Position Duration
Special Assistant United States Attorney at Department of Justice, US Attorneys Office, District of Columbia 1980–2009
Principal at Nagin, Gallop & Figueredo, PA 1997–2008
See all 4 job entries

Education

School Major Degree Graduated
University of Miami School of Law Law JD - Juris Doctor 1974

Portfolio

Publications

Article Publication Date
Extensive case note: KSR Int’l. Co. v. Teleflex, Inc, Business Law Section Journal, The Florida Bar 2008
Extensive case note: Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. Business Law Section Journal, The Florida Bar 2008
See all 4 publications

Cases

Title:
Magnivision, Inc. v. The Bonneau Company, 2003 WL 23320550 (C.D.Cal. 2003).
Practice Area:
Patent Infringement
Outcome:
Prevailed; Judgment for $11,000,000
Description:
Patent Infringement action involving three patents.

See all cases

White Collar Crime Resources

View all White Collar Crime Answers & Advice