Skip to main content
Kimberly Keheley Frye
Avvo
Pro

Kimberly Frye’s Legal Cases

10 total

  • Brinson

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Outcome:
    Defendant convicted of DUI
    Description:
    As a prosecutor for the State, successfully convinced a jury of defendant's guilt in a .085 one intox blow case. Defendant had done well on the fields in the video. It was a 2nd in 5 years and the judge had specifically excluded the similar.
  • J.N. Cherokee County Magistrate Court

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Outcome:
    All charges dismissed for my client
    Description:
    A citizen had attempted to take a warrant for my client. After a successful hearing, the Court dismissed all charges and assessed costs and attorneys fees against the other party.
  • St. v. Head

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Outcome:
    My Client pled to a misdmeanor during a trial
    Description:
    My client was originally charged with one misdemeanor and 4 felonies and was being held in jail. He as facing a maximum of 21 years in custody. As a result of our speedy trial demand, he was brought to trial within 6 months of arrest. On the second day of trial as a result of a review of our submitted jury charges, the State reduced all charges to misdemeanors. A successful argument to the Court that all the counts merged into one resulted in my client receiving only 1 misdemeanor and he was released on that charged on the time that he had served. My client was thrilled with the outcome of his case.
  • St. v. McNeil

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Outcome:
    Case was dismissed by the Court
    Description:
    I argued that my client's due process rights had been violated when I discovered that the state had destroyed some videotaped evidence 0f our case through their negligence. My argument that the destroyed evidence was material and exculpatory to our case convinced the trial Court that the prosecution should not be allowed to go forward. All charges were dismissed against my client.
  • St. of Ga v. Fedak

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Outcome:
    Case reversed after Motion for New Trial Appeal
    Description:
    Client was wrongly convicted and harshly sentenced in Cherokee County Superior Court case because of a sub-standard performance by his trial attorney. The deficient performance of trial counsel was illuminated and exposed in a evidentiary motion for new trial that lasted twice as long as the original jury trial. Expert witness neurologist was obtained and examined substantiating client's significant medical defense. Myself along with co-counsel requested the Court of Appeals reverse the conviction based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The Court of Appeals agreed that trial counsel was deficient and reversed clients conviction.
  • State v. MH

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Outcome:
    Plea to invalid license
    Description:
    Client with a suspended license charged with DUI. Successful defense regarding the officers mistakes along with client's diabetes resulting in a plea to a no points invalid license.
  • State v. Midani

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Outcome:
    All charges dismissed
    Description:
    Innocent client charged with Forgery. After preparing for trial, the State was able to see that the case against my client could not be won.
  • State v. AG

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Aug 06, 2010
    Outcome:
    Case Dismissed
    Description:
    Young man charged with Cruelty to Children
  • State v. Tracey P

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Jun 28, 2012
    Outcome:
    Charges Dismissed
    Description:
    All charges dismissed after Motion to Suppress hearing. Court held that no criminal act occurred.
  • St. v. Harper, Chapman & Pombert

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Mar 15, 2013
    Outcome:
    All charges dismissed by the District Attorney
    Description:
    RICO case involving Glock Industries. After 3 years of litigation in the trial court and appellate courts where the structure of the original indictment was challenged.