609-737-2222
If he didn't claim the child in past years, I think it's HIGHLY unlikely that a court will tell you to go back and amend your returns. You couldn't have both claimed the child - the IRS would reject the second-filed return. The IRS rules state that the custodial parent gets to claim the child, however a state court judgment / order can allocate it. Google Gwodz v. Gwodz for "the" NJ case on it. If it's in the judgment / order that you alternate and you took him last year, then, yeah, he's...
Selected as best answer
Well, it doesn't mean that it's necessarily going to become an emotional, financially draining nightmare, but it doesn't sound "uncontested", either. You may need to look into whether you two can realistically afford to keep it during the divorce process - if not, a judge can order it sold now (Randazzo v. Randazzo). Otherwise, figure 15-20 months after the complaint is filed before it'll be getting sold. Perhaps there's some other concession he's looking for to suddenly get...
Selected as best answer
You could file a motion and ask a judge to address it or to refer you to mediation to address and, pending mediation, to order an interim solution. You could also pick up the kids and let her know via text that they'll be available for her to pick up at X ' Clock as per the arrangement, that they'll be ready for her to pick up, but that you won't be driving them back? It'd a little aggressive, but it might prompt a conversation, and she can't claim you interfered with the order if it says...
Selected as best answer
Yeah, I'm going to be a little more direct and say what a couple of the other answers imply: I don't believe you. I think he beat hell out of you and you're trying to save his skin beacuse you're in the cycle of an abusive relationship. In my experience the most "real" DV victims are also the quickest to say the charges should be dropped (by contrast, the "harassment" / "name calling" ones seem to never quit....). You've got to keep in mind the domestic violence is a cycle. Read this:...
7 lawyers agreed with this answer
First, although I'm a dedicated proponent of shared custody, I shiver at a schedule that had an 11 month old with each of you for a week. That's too long for a child of that age; the baby can't conceive of "I'll see dad / mom in a week"; they will mourn the other parent as if they died. 2 each, max, and review it when the child is around 2. Check out: http://divorcelawyerspokane.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Kelly-Lamb-Using-Child-Development-Research-.pdf As to the games she's...
7 lawyers agreed with this answer
The prosecutor will certainly speak to you and inquire as to how you want to proceed. If you say you're not inclined to testify, they'll offer him a plea bargain. Keep in mind that on a second conviction for a violating a restraining order, there's a MANDATORY jail sentence; judge has no discretion over it. If you're looking to cut him a break but keep the RO, he could (perhaps - discuss with prosecutor) plead to harassment, with the agreement that a second violation will be considered a...
Selected as best answer
It sounds like the court was telegraphing / underlining that its decision was a "final order" and not interlocutory (meaning "not final"). Two possible reasons - if there was any lingering impression that further proceedings were going to be scheduled on this issue, this provision makes clear that there aren't. Also, if another provision in the order was arguably not final (thus preventing the deadline from ruing for appellate purposes), this makes clear that the order is "final."
Selected as best answer
I'm not clear on how she established a sufficient relationship (and how a court found that the severing of that relationship would cause harm to her, which is required to order third party visitation) - there's got to be more facts here. If there's a court order, you can't violate it unless you can demonstrate that complying would put your daughter in harm's way. Especially with an order that old, it sounds like you need to file a motion and ask a judge to review the situation. Would be a...
Selected as best answer
While the above is generally correct, and I agree you need to get a consult and not try to handle this over a Q&A board, especially as there are children involved, the facts you're giving - if proved - might well result in you not having a pendente lite obligation. In Rose v. Csapo, http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5732515355778388304&q=csapo&hl=en&as_sdt=4,31 , the court ruled that when a supported spouse cohabits on a pendente lite basis, no support should be ordered. However, in...
Selected as best answer
If you can locate her to have her served or she's willing to sign, her living outside the country is irrelevant. If you can't locate her, you'll have to proceed by publication. It can be tricky, and many judges have different standards for the hoops you'll have to jump through to provide you diligently tried to locate her. When the judge approves it, you'll publish a notice in the newspaper and that will be considered "service" of the complaint. It's probably easier and quicker to do this...
6 lawyers agreed with this answer
1 person marked this answer as helpful