Skip to main content
Robert N Braverman
Avvo
Pro

Robert Braverman’s Legal Cases

6 total

  • In re Warrington 424 BR 186 (Bankr ED PA 2010

    Practice Area:
    Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    Date:
    Jan 01, 2010
    Outcome:
    Court required creditor to return vehicle to my client
    Description:
    Secured creditor refused to return vehicle repossessed just before bankruptcy filed
  • In re Stewart, 368 B. R. 445 (Bankr PA 2007)

    Practice Area:
    Bankruptcy & Debt
    Date:
    Jan 01, 2007
    Outcome:
    Court and appellate court agreed that the mother was the true owner of the property
    Description:
    Son's bankruptcy trustee attempted to sell mother's home that had been placed in son's name for no consideration
  • In re Decalcamania Mfg Group, 245 B.R. 1921 (Bankr NJ 1990)

    Practice Area:
    Bankruptcy & Debt
    Date:
    Jan 01, 1990
    Outcome:
    The result was Bankruptcy Court agreed with Mr. Braverman and overturned the Sheriff’s Sale as a conveyance for less than fair value.
    Description:
    Client’s property sold in Sheriff Sale prior to retaining Robert Braverman to file bankruptcy.
  • Bank of NJ v. Pullini, 194 N.J. Super 163 (N.J. Super A.D. 1984)

    Practice Area:
    Bankruptcy & Debt
    Date:
    Jan 01, 1984
    Outcome:
    Mr. Braverman was successful before the Appellate Division in arguing that client guaranteed a secured debt and since the bank failed to obtain a security interest they could not pursue client on guarantee.
    Description:
    Bank sued Mr. Braverman’s client as co-signer on vehicle where bank had failed to properly obtain a security interest in vehicle.
  • In re Lewis, 63 B.R. 90 (Bankr E.D. PA 1986)

    Practice Area:
    Bankruptcy & Debt
    Date:
    Jan 01, 1986
    Outcome:
    The Bankruptcy Court concluded that the debtors may propose a confirmable Plan under Chapter 13 to satisfy arrearages after a Chapter 7.
    Description:
    The case involved issue of whether after a Chapter 7 a debtor could file a Chapter 13 Plan to satisfy the mortgage arrears
  • In re McKeon, 86 B.R. 350 (Bankr NJ 1988)

    Practice Area:
    Bankruptcy & Debt
    Date:
    Jan 01, 1988
    Outcome:
    Matter involved 23 consolidated cases addressing the extent to which Ch. 13 debtor may propose to deal with claim of mortgagee in Ch. 13 Plan when there is a final judgment. The Court concluded Plans did not adequately protect secured creditor’s rights
    Description:
    Case dealt with a mortgage company seeking relief from the Automatic Stay and the rights of a debtor when a foreclosure judgment has already been entered prior to the filing of the bankruptcy.