Skip to main content
Mitchell J. Matorin

Mitchell Matorin’s Legal Cases

10 total

  • Blazy v. Tenet

    Practice Area:
    Appeals
    Date:
    Oct 26, 1999
    Outcome:
    Clarified right to attorney fees under Privacy Act
    Description:
    (not available)
  • H.B. Mac, Inc. v. United States

    Practice Area:
    Appeals
    Date:
    Jan 01, 1998
    Outcome:
    Obtained reversal of district court
    Description:
    Government contractor sued for increased costs due to alleged differing site conditions. Court of Federal Claims ruled in favor of contractor. On appeal, Federal Circuit reversed.
  • Barseback Kraft, A.B. v. United States

    Practice Area:
    Appeals
    Date:
    Jan 01, 1997
    Outcome:
    Obtained affirmance of summary judgment
    Description:
    Nuclear utilities sued for breach of contract and breach of international treaty obligations pertaining to United States government uranium enrichment services.
  • State of Florida, Dept. of Insurance v. United States

    Practice Area:
    Appeals
    Date:
    Jan 01, 1996
    Outcome:
    (not available)
    Description:
    (not available)
  • Florida Power & Light Co. v. United States

    Practice Area:
    Contracts & Agreements
    Date:
    Jan 01, 1998
    Outcome:
    Summary Judgment in favor of client
    Description:
    (not available)
  • Bixby Ranch Co. v. United States

    Practice Area:
    Government
    Date:
    Jan 01, 1996
    Outcome:
    Summary judgment in favor of client
    Description:
    (not available)
  • United States v. NBD Bank, N.A.

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Date:
    Jan 01, 1996
    Outcome:
    Obtained summary judgment for client
    Description:
    Defendant NBD Bank appropriated funds from GNMA trust account to apply to debt owed by mortgage lender. This case established precedent allowing the government to recover from the bank money that it had improperly removed from a trust account.
  • MHA Financial Corp. et al. v. Varenko Investments Ltd., et al.

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Date:
    Mar 02, 2009
    Outcome:
    Held personal jurisdiction existed
    Description:
    Plaintiffs sued for abuse of process and related claims against foreign corporation,foreign board member, and their attorney, for filing abusive lawsuit alleging fraud against financial services industry plaintiff. Defendants challenged personal jurisdiction. Court held personal jurisdiction proper over all defendants on abuse of process claim.
  • SportsChannel New England LP d/b/a Comcast SportsNet New England v Fancaster, Inc.

    Practice Area:
    Trademark Infringement
    Date:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Outcome:
    Court granted Fancaster's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction
    Description:
    After Fancaster sued Comcast in the District of New Jersey for infringement of its FANCASTER federal trademark, Comcast sued Fancaster in the DIstrict of Massachusetts for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of that same trademark. Fancaster moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Comcast argued jurisdiction existed because Fancaster operated an Internet website accessible from Massachusetts. www.matorinlaw.com/linked/comcast sportsnet new england v. fancaster inc.pdf
  • Fancaster, Inc. v. Comcast Corporation, et al.

    Practice Area:
    Trademark Infringement
    Date:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Outcome:
    Court granted motion for leave to file supplemental complaint
    Description:
    Fancaster sued Comcast for infringement of its FANCASTER trademark. I took over the case from Fancaster's prior counsel. Fancaster moved to supplement the complaint to add claims based on new infringing activity and to clarify that Fancaster was seeking its statutory remedy of Comcast's profits. http://www.matorinlaw.com/linked/fancaster v. comcast order granting leave to supplement complaint.pdf