Skip to main content
Elliot S Coren
Avvo
Pro

Elliot Coren’s Legal Cases

6 total

  • Shanahan v. Friendly

    Practice Area:
    Personal Injury
    Date:
    Apr 25, 2003
    Outcome:
    1.34 million dollars with interest
    Description:
    Client tripped by easel running to prevent grandson from running out of restaurant into street; permanent injury preventing further employment as union worker with tunneling equipment. Judge stated on the record to Mr. Coren that this was as good a slip and fall case as ever tried before him
  • Sandsbury v Ranpak

    Practice Area:
    Personal Injury
    Date:
    Jun 03, 2002
    Outcome:
    Settled for $210,000
    Description:
    Client worked with machine that compacted cardboard into packing. When machine jammed client would reach into front of machine to clear jam. Machine had print saying DO NOT PUT HAND IN MACHINE. Client lost tips of 2 fingers.
  • Divorce case

    Practice Area:
    Divorce & Separation
    Date:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Outcome:
    Client entered into a divorce agreement. Very satisfed.
    Description:
    Wife dischared prior counsel and hired me. Husband worked for a hedge fund. Case required substantial financial discovery. Worked out a complicated financial child support and alimony formula tied to Husband's expected earnings.
  • Rego v. Smart Transportation, Inc.

    Practice Area:
    Personal Injury
    Date:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Outcome:
    Settled for $300,000.
    Description:
    Client's vehicle struck by tractor-trailer; client suffered soft tissue injuries and post-traumatic stress; insurance company offered little money until Attorney Coren sued insurer for unfair settlement practices.
  • X v Y; Divorce

    Practice Area:
    Divorce & Separation
    Date:
    Oct 01, 2011
    Outcome:
    Mediation led to Agreement; client extremely pleased.
    Description:
    Client high level investment bank executive; wanted divorce but wanted it done with dignity and fairness to spouse; engaged a mediator and negotiated acceptable financial; terms with opposing attorney for alimony, child support, children's college expenses and division of assets; client extremely happy case mediated and settled without adversarial overtones.
  • Estate of Phyllis Tano

    Practice Area:
    Probate
    Date:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Outcome:
    Client won her case at trial.
    Description:
    Client named beneficiary in aunt's will; uncle who was written out of will destroyed will and claimed estate assets for himself. Case was tried before a probate judge; client won her case and received her full estate share.