Skip to main content
Kevin J Mahoney
Avvo
Pro

Kevin Mahoney’s Legal Cases

48 total


  • Mahoney Wins Verdict of $385,000.00

    Practice Area:
    Defective and Dangerous Products
    Outcome:
    Verdict for Plaintiff of $385,000.00
    Description:
    In his first Superior Court civil trial, Mahoney was representing the Plaintiff, who owned a restaurant in the Defendant's building. Mahoney proved that the Defendant -- who owned the building -- had been attempted to sever a pipe with a blow torch when he accidentally set the building ablaze. 48 Hours televised the fire. One of the partners, after seeing Mahoney cross-examine a witness, pulled him aside and said, "You're a natural in the courtroom."
  • Commonwealth v. B.M.

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty
    Description:
    Defendant was indicted for one count of rape on an articulate, young woman who was studying at B.U. for her masters degree in psychology. After a four day trial, the jury found the Defendant not guilty..
  • Commonwealth vs. S.L.

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty
    Description:
    On dark lonely road, defendant accidentally struck boy with her car. Boy, who was dressed in all dark clothing, was killed. State Police charged her with motor vehicle homicide. Jury deliberated for approximately 45 minutes before acquitting the defendant.
  • Commonwealth vs. J.R.

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Outcome:
    Dismissed
    Description:
    Arson – Dismissed Arson – Dismissed Arson – Dismissed Arson – Dismissed Arson – Dismissed B&E – Dismissed B&E – Dismissed B&E – Dismissed B&E – Dismissed
  • Commonwealth vs. J.R.

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    May 26, 2005
    Outcome:
    Dismissed, Not Guilty
    Description:
    Possession of an Incendiary Device – Dismissed Disturbing the Peace – not guilty Police, responding to Defendant’s home on complaint of loud explosions coming from the backyard, heard a huge explosion and saw a large fireball rise from behind the single story. They claimed they saw the Defendant holding some type of device in his hands. Running to the backyard, the police discovered a crater with a burm mark around its rim.
  • Commonwealth vs. D.D.

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    May 12, 2005
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty
    Description:
    kidnapping -- Not Guilty aggravated rape -- Not Guilty aggravated rape -- Not Guilty aggravated rape -- Not Guilty aggravated rape -- Not Guilty aggravated rape -- Not Guilty indecent A&B -- Not Guilty indecent A&B -- Not Guilty indecent A&B -- Not Guilty indecent A&B -- Not Guilty Alleged victim testified that, following a work party, the defendant locked her in the basement of the office building, overpowered her, slammed her into a wall injuring her wrist and repeatedly raped and assaulted her. The District Attorney's Office called five witnesses. The defense called not one witness. The jury deliberated for two days.
  • Commonwealth vs. D.D

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    May 05, 2005
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty
    Description:
    kidnapping -- Not Guilty aggravated rape -- Not Guilty aggravated rape -- Not Guilty aggravated rape -- Not Guilty aggravated rape -- Not Guilty aggravated rape -- Not Guilty indecent A&B -- Not Guilty indecent A&B -- Not Guilty indecent A&B -- Not Guilty indecent A&B -- Not Guilty Alleged victim testified that, following a work party, the defendant locked her in the basement of the office building, overpowered her, slammed her into a wall injuring her wrist and repeatedly raped and assaulted her. The District Attorney's Office called five witnesses. The defense called not one witness. The jury deliberated for two days.
  • Commonwealth vs. W.T.

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty
    Description:
    Possession of Class B (cocaine) -- Not Guilty According to prosecution, once the Defendant observed a Mass State Police Cruiser, he attempted to evade the Trooper by driving behind a Burger King restaurant. When the Defendant finally drove away, the Trooper pulled him over. Inside the car, the Trooper discovered a bag of cocaine. A co-defendant informed the Trooper that she, the defendant, and the other two occupants had gone to Boston to purchase the cocaine. According to the State Trooper, the defendant conceded to him that what the co-defendant had said was true.
  • Commonwealth vs. J.K.

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty
    Description:
    Operating Under the Influence -- Not Guilty State Trooper testified that he observed a BMW weaving in and out of its lane on 95 North in Attleboro. The Trooper testified that he smelled a strong odor of alcohol on the client's breath and that the client slurred and gave confusing answers to simple questions. Client admitted drinking four rum and cokes. According to the Trooper, the client failed the field sobriety tests known as the heel-to-toe and one-leg stand. Trooper admitted client passed the alphabet test.
  • Commonwealth vs. M.P.F.

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    May 24, 2004
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty
    Description:
    Rape of Child -- Not Guilty Rape of Child -- Not Guilty Indecent A&B -- Not Guilty Indecent A&B -- Not Guilty Indecent A&B -- Not Guilty A&B Dangerous Weapon -- Not Guilty A&B Dangerous Weapon -- Not Guilty A&B Dangerous Weapon -- Not Guilty A&B -- Not Guilty Dissemination of Pornographic Material -- Not Guilty Defendant's daughter testified that between her 8th and 10th grades, the Defendant raped her twice a week for 2 years, beat her with an electrical cord and a police stick, broke plates over her head, punched her in the stomach, and forced her to watch pornography. The jury deliberated for 8 1/2 hrs.