Skip to main content
Howard M Lewis
Avvo
Pro

Howard Lewis’s Legal Cases

108 total

  • Lump Sum Alimony Awarded

    Practice Area:
    Alimony
    Date:
    Oct 09, 2012
    Outcome:
    Large lump sum payment made and personal property awarded
    Description:
    Short term marriage, our client was abandoned by her spouse shortly after the marriage.
  • Overnight Visitation Awarded

    Practice Area:
    Child Custody
    Date:
    Oct 01, 2012
    Outcome:
    Overnight visitation awarded to our client
    Description:
    Short term marriage, minor child involved, opposing party refused overnight visitation, and sought increase in child support and alimony, after hearing the court found for our client on all matters.
  • Our client awarded marital home

    Practice Area:
    Divorce & Separation
    Date:
    Nov 02, 2012
    Outcome:
    Our client awarded Maritial Residence
    Description:
    Medium term marriage, our client filed for divorce and sought equitable division of maritial estate, opposing party sought marital residence and six figure settlement demand, court found for our client on all matters and awarded martial residence and 4 figure settlement.
  • Our Client awarded 90 percent of families multiple real estate holding

    Practice Area:
    Divorce & Separation
    Date:
    Nov 14, 2012
    Outcome:
    Our client awarded majority of real estate
    Description:
    Long term marriage, large real estate holdings and marital estate, opposing counsel sought to sell and divide the entire marital estate seeking a disproportionate share to their clieint, after multiple court hearings court awarded majority of real estate holdings to our client and alimony payments at a reduced rate.
  • Client awarded Child Support and Marital Residence

    Practice Area:
    Divorce & Separation
    Date:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Outcome:
    Increase Child Support/ Judgement for our client for maritial residence
    Description:
    Contested Divorce that resulted in judgement for our client of chlld support above guidelines and maritial home.
  • Divorced from Foreign Jurisdiction

    Practice Area:
    Divorce & Separation
    Date:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Outcome:
    Client Divorced in Ma, maintained complete marital estate
    Description:
    Our clients sought divorce from spouse who refused to cooperate, after negotiations, opposing party agreed to all of our clients terms and the divorce agreement was completed, presented to the court and accepted by Suffolk County, our client recieved 100 percent of his requests.
  • Child Allowed to Relocate School

    Practice Area:
    Child Custody
    Date:
    Nov 19, 2012
    Outcome:
    Removal Allowed
    Description:
    During a pending divorce, our client sought that her son be allowed to relocate to a new school system within her jurisdiction, after hearing and evidence the court agreed and allowed the removal.
  • Our Client found NOT in Contempt

    Practice Area:
    Child Support
    Date:
    Dec 21, 2012
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty of Contempt
    Description:
    A contempt was filed against our client for failure to pay college expenses, after an evidentiary hearing where all parties testifed, the court ruled our client was not guilty of contempt.
  • Our Client divorced and awarded majority of marital estate

    Practice Area:
    Divorce & Separation
    Date:
    Jan 03, 2013
    Outcome:
    Our client awarded larger portion of marital estate
    Description:
    long term marriage, husband attempted to hide true value of family owned business, after forensic accounting, conciliation and court dates matter settled on trial date awarding disproportionatly larger percentage of marital estate to our client, alimony and child support
  • Divorce Granted over objection of spouse

    Practice Area:
    Divorce & Separation
    Date:
    Feb 12, 2013
    Outcome:
    Our client awarded Divorce and immigration protection
    Description:
    Our client sought a divorce, opposing counsel and opposing spouse sought Annulment which would have potentially harmed long term immigration issues, after protracted litigation, Divorce granted, our client remained protected.