582 Client Reviews
Showing 581 - 582 of 582 reviews
Posted by anonymous | June 24, 2023 | Hired Attorney
Paul Lang
Don’t get me wrong he’s a great guy and has a strong pull within the court system. But if you are fighting anything major or firearm related you are better off joining a lodge and becoming a Freemason, they get away with anything.
Unfortunately, this same person has decided to post two negative reviews anonymously. I am posting my response to your other review here as well: You were charged with felony gun possession, misdemeanor drug possession and DUI out of Bucks County. You failed field sobriety tests and gave consent to search your car, which resulted in the gun and drugs being found. I hit the government very hard at the preliminary hearing and filed significant motions. About 3 months ago, upon your authority, I began negotiations. The DA agreed to drop the felony and agree to probation on the gun case and the mandatory minimum on the DUI. You were thrilled. The felony was dropped to a misdemeanor. You said in your review that you have a felony on your record - you are wrong. You are not reading the charges correctly. You missed court the next day and I convinced the judge not to issue a bench warrant. As you know, we would send you letters and call you to come in to review the case. You didn’t come into the office for any other appointments because you “were good” with the negotiation. Two weeks ago, we entered the negotiated plea agreement. We filled out the paperwork with your mother present and you stated in open court this was your decision (you were asked twice “is this decision your’s and your’s alone? And you responded “yes” on paper and in open court). You then decided not to report to probation. Now, you’re having second thoughts and this is because of me ? Since the plea, I’ve spoken to you 4 times, returned an inordinate amount of texts, spoke to your uncle individually, texted with your uncle, and had a conference call with you and your uncle. You later posted this and another review after I didn’t return your call at 7:53 a.m. this past Saturday. As I told you since the beginning, I would go to trial if the client wants. You did not want that. No one put the words in your mouth at court. Blame the system, Bucks County, and anything else you want. But you really shouldn’t be blaming me for the decision you controlled and ultimately made. I would have done whatever you wanted. As far as your racial statements, I am deeply offended. I have proudly represented all individuals (as the 450 other reviews show) and am proud of the diversity of my clients.
Posted by Ray | April 22, 2017 | Hired Attorney
Beware of this guy!
My wife and I hired this "lawyer" to represent our nephew on a CDS charge. He was all talk and boy was he good at talking! When it came to representing our nephew...NOT SO MUCH!! Talk about a SHEISTER! You've been warned!
I suspect this "review" has been fraudulently posted by a competing lawyer. First, I have never in my entire career encountered a person who calls it a "CDS" charge except attorneys. It is referred to as a "possession" charge, never a "CDS" except between prosecutors and lawyers. Second, a CDS charge is perhaps the most basic of cases and is pretty difficult for even inexperienced lawyers to screw up. Third, I have not represented a person whose uncle was involved in their case. Finally, I would remember if a client was unsatisfied. As such, I believe this is a competing, jealous attorney who is trying to tear down a reputation I've worked damn hard to build. Please read the 100+ other positive reviews and cases of success. Update: Please keep in mind that "CDS" is a possession charge in NJ. As my practice has become busier in PA, I have taken very few cases in NJ. I have had one CDS case in NJ in the last 3 years. It was for a 40-something year old man who retained me (not his uncle) and his case was in Lambertville Municipal Court. I was able to get his entire case dismissed --Not downgraded, not amended -- dismissed. He is a friend to this day. Clearly, this review is fraudulent.