117 Client Reviews
Showing 66 - 70 of 117 reviews
Posted by Doug D. | May 24, 2019
Different views
Mr. Tischhauser and I have had words in the past. And i gave reviews then. This meeting however was not bad. The difference of opinion us still there, but our chat was not like those in the past. He has a certain way of thinking that I am not accustomed to. I'm sure he feels the same way about ...
Posted by anonymous | May 03, 2019
Rude and arrogant.
Upon consulting with this attorney, he was extremely rude and close minded. Did not try to listen or emphasize with my situation at all. Instead of listening, he spoke AT me. After reading these other bad reviews about him, I quickly realized that I was not the only one who's experienced this from hi...
This is why we encourage people to read and consider the reviews FROM ACTUAL CLIENTS in contrast to these types of posts. Sadly, this seems to be the new norm for angry, disgruntled and often petty people on the internet that don't like being told what they don't want to hear in an AVVO comments; to hide behind the ability to be anonymous while filing retaliatory one star reviews. We equally encourage readers to read our responses as they provide "the rest of the story" and welcome them to judge the issues for themselves. As a teaching point here, for those looking to retain or consult with lawyers in the future, especially though online services, if your focus is for lawyers to "empathize" with you or your situation and view legal advice you don't agree with as "close minded" or "rude" because it doesn't support your views, you are doing yourself a disservice. You need to remember you are consulting with a lawyer, not looking for a new best friend for vent with or someone to agree with you as an expensive means to provide emotional support. It is my view that the BEST service a lawyer can provide any client is to objectively analyze your situation, provide practical solutions, to provide a realistic game plan for actually resolving the issues, and to refrain from enabling clients engaged in poor or emotional decision making or conduct. In many instances, due to a wide variety of circumstances, whether due to the constraints of the legal system, financial considerations, legal or personal issues, that entails dealing with the painful reality that one's expectations may have to be adjusted to account for those issues and that many times legal remedies are not the solution to every problem.
Posted by Edward | January 03, 2019
Mark Tells It Like It Is!
Mark and I have had several discussions regarding my 5-year long "war" with Bank of America on a Quiet Title action I filed in 2014. I have not made a mortgage payment since 2008 and I am NOT in foreclosure because I'm not your average pro se litigant! Mark knows the TRUTH about how the system REALLY...
Posted by anonymous | December 31, 2018
Disrespectful
I inquired about a situation I am currently in with my landlord and he belittled me and accused me of being money hungry. Very rude, watch out for him.
Its like a broken record, unfortunately, and again - not an actual client - but an unhappy blurb recipient....where unreasonable people ask for legal "advice" and and when told that their position is unreasonable, are "offended" simply because they weren't told what they wanted to hear. Unfortunately, such people do NOT seek "legal advice" but rather cheer leading or to coached in "working" the system. Anyone that doesn't support them blindly or challenges or questions the claims, is "rude" and immediately gets "1 star" review in typical fashion, until they are told what they want or are simply ignored, where they complain lawyers "suck and wont help them." In this instance the poster finds offense at being challenged as a college student renter on the motives behind a barrage of claims made as a tenant trying to get out of a lease. By example, the poster claimed that there was a "mold problem" where mold had infested the entire kitchen, all of their clothes, shoes and and walls in the rental. ODDLY, when the Landlord agreed to let them out of the lease to move, the poster DEMANDED A TWO MONTH EXTENSION to do so. Sorry, but ANY JUDGE will raise an eyebrow at that, as its absolutely inconsistent with legitimate claims that the mold is a health hazard as the basis to terminate a lease because the property uninhabitable. Why? ANY rational person would have moved out immediately, not negotiated for a longer stay in the same uninhabitable conditions. Then, when the LL only agrees to a 30 day move out, the poster immediately thereafter claims to have fallen on the porch, submitting an injury claim to the landlord for compensation for a "bruised leg". Sorry, but as a TENANT lawyer, the frequency, timing and nature of such claims, will likely be viewed by most judges as another of the many played out ploys used by tenants to leverage landlords for money or concessions in a tenancy that has gone bad. If being provided objective legal assessments hurts poster's feelings, and is "rude" well........., as I continue to state, so be it. I do not, and will not, frame my posts to pander to people sensitive feelings, find new internet BFF's through clients, and have no desire to treat clients as "besties" nor provide improper enabling or reinforcement of poor decision making, over providing rational legal opinion, direction to good decision making and practical guidance to resolve controversies if possible.
Posted by anonymous | December 17, 2018
Great advice
Responded quickly to my inquiry. Went the extra mile and called me to follow up. Would highly recommend.