Avvo Review Score

4.9 /5.0

157 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (157) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 101 - 105 of 122 reviews | Case Results

Posted by teresa | March 21, 2010

too busy for tickets

took my retainer to handle some tickets for me and knew from the begining the tickets were issued by a constable and he has done this for long enough that he knew that because a constable issued the citations they were locked in .. no getting out of them the only way to handle these citations was ...to pay the fine and let them go on my driving record he could have told me that from the very jump and saved me the retainer fee he took and did absolutely nothing for. except tell me the amount of the fines about three months after the fact

John Gioffredi

Replied last April 08, 2026

I don't know this person, and I don't understand what her complaint is, but she's obviously unhappy. She's also obviously wrong about several things. >>>>>> . 1) There's simply no such thing as fines or citations being "locked in." I have no idea where she got that idea. We can always fight the allegations by a contested trial if the person wants to pay us additional money to do so. That doesn't necessarily mean that we are going to win the trial, or that it makes the best financial sense to have a trial, but the trial option is always available for the client if they tell us that they want a trial. 2) Unless there was something unusual about the citation (i.e. - 120 mph in a school zone), under current procedures we can pretty much ALWAYS keep the citation off of the client's driving record - provided that they pay a probation fee on time and otherwise follow our instructions. I suspect that this person either didn't pay on time or didn't follow our instructions otherwise. 3) Specifically, under current procedures available to us, we can almost always keep a ticket issued by a Dallas CONSTABLE off a defendant's driving record by appealing the case and getting the defendant deferred adjudication at the county court. This procedure has been available for so long and is so successful in achieving an eventual dismissal that we always choose this procedure - unless the client affirmatively states that they want a contested trial instead, and then pays us to do the trial. >>>>>> If this client is upset that paying a probation fee is the ONLY guaranteed way to keep a Dallas constable - issued citation off of her driving record, we have no control over that, other than to simply explain that to her up front. And we always provide people this information, orally and in writing, before they hire us. It's in our contract. >>>>>> We always tell our clients what to expect when they hire us. I've never taken money from a client if I knew I couldn't help, and I've never taken money from a client and then "done nothing." If this unhappy client, or anyone else believes otherwise, I encourage them to call my office any day, any time, and ask any person on my staff what we can do with a ticket issued by a Dallas county constable. The telephone number is 214-739-4515. No matter when you call, or how many times you call, or who you talk to, you will always get the same truthful answer - every time. >>>>>> Perhaps this person wanted or expected her citations to be dismissed outright. Sometimes we are able to do that, if there is a legal deficiency in the complaint, but most times that doesn't happen, and we tell people all of that up front. We can only follow the legal procedures which are available at any given time. We have no magic wand to simply make tickets mysteriously disappear. Believe me, I wish it were otherwise. If anyone can provide me with such a magic wand, notwithstanding my own doubts about the existence of such wands, I will waive it around so we can all see what happens.

Posted by Harold | March 18, 2010

Lawyers use John Gioffredi

I have been using John's firm for traffic tickets for about 15 years. They have gotten loads of traffic tickets dismissed for me. They have a professional, systematic setup to handle these tickets.

Posted by Kevin | February 25, 2010

My trial experience with this firm... Gioffredi: 2, State of Texas: 0

John Gioffredi himself has represented me twice to date in a trial setting where the outcome was a not guilty verdict. The first was initially charged as assault on a public servant (cop) and resisting arrest back in 2003. The basic premise of this case was two cops, one from Dallas and another f...rom Garland, who were both in the same car, what they referred to as a "ride along", tried to accuse me of attempting to break into my own car (wth?) When I started becoming a bit of a smart ass with the officers I ended up spending the night in a Garland jail with a fractured nose that was spewing blood and snot all over the place. Mind you, I was up against two cops with no video evidence of my innocence. They ended up dropping the assault on a public servant charge but proceeded to prosecute me with the resisting arrest charge. I called Gioffredi's office to see if he'd mind sitting down with me for a quick consultation. He agreed to meet me after he was through with court for the day. So I stopped by his office and we discussed the details of the case. He stated that resisting arrest is often little more than a bullshit charge, and that's exactly what it was. Fast forward 1.5 years. In the trial Gioffredi meticulously picked the testimony of both officers to pieces. You really have to see this guy work, it's pretty cool to follow his logic. The jury was convinced by his smooth and easy to digest explanation of the law and how it applied to the case. End result, Not Guilty! When the trial was over and I had my not guilty verdict in hand, Mr. Gioffredi even referred me to another attorney to handle the civil suit over the excessive force that the police officers used. Throughout the years I've used Gioffredi's office numerous times for speeding violations and the like and have had great success. Once I even was given deferred adjudication probation for speeding in Rowlett, violated it by speeding in Rowlett again and was simply given more deferred adjudication probation. I'm telling you, this guy is insanely good at what he does. Skip ahead to February 2009. I got pulled over for what the officers stated was a speeding violation. They said they smelled alcohol on my breath and asked me to get out of the vehicle. As naive as I could be I complied and began to take the field sobriety tests. If you've used Gioffredi for anything before, you'll know this is stupid because I blatantly disregarded the verbiage on the back of his card. Anyway, judging by the video I saw in court, I botched the walk the line test up pretty badly... in fact, instead of turning around I walked the line backward losing balance and using my arms to stabilize myself. From that test alone you'd have sworn I was hammered. I was arrested and transported to Lew Sterret where the officers attempted to get me to submit to more tests... at this point I started referring to the back of Gioffredi's card which I've had to use on numerous occasions for traffic violations. It basically says don't submit to the tests... no tests... no evidence, no evidence means not guilty. They just kept asking me to take more tests and more tests and reading from this checklist type sheet of paper as if they didn't hear or didn't care about me declining to take the tests. I became a bit of a smart ass again and spent the night in jail. I called Gioffredi's office up and arranged to go to trial. My license was suspended for 180 days for refusing to take the breath test or give blood but Gioffredi's office handled getting me an occupational license that would allow me to drive just about anywhere in Texas but only for 12 hours per day. I did get to split the 12 hours up however I wanted, but I had to do this in advance by creating a schedule of when I needed to drive. During the trial Gioffredi pulled out books and written sworn testimony from the cops and again began to pick their testimony to pieces. At one point in the trial, he actually had the Dallas cop of 20 years admit to performing the HGN (follow the pen with your eye) test improperly for

Posted by Miles Caraveo | February 25, 2010

My Rating

John is a smart and funny guy.His knowledge of the law helped me stay calm and collective during my trials.He will push for what's best for your case.Mr. Gioffredi is a responsible and reliable lawyer who will aid you in getting the least possible punishment with a case if not getting a clean dismiss...al.It's a privelage to have John as my lawyer.

Posted by Susan | February 23, 2010

I do not recommend this law firm

I used this law firm in 2005 for a traffic violation and when I just tried to renew my license this year (2010) I found that they had NOT taken care of the ticket even though they gave me a pink slip that said it was taken care of. Now I have to fight to get it taken care of, and they are completely... unwilling to take care of what I already paid them for! I am a legal secretary and this law firm came highly recommended to me by the attorneys at my firm. Evidently they take care of you if you are an attorney, but otherwise they could care less.

John Gioffredi

Replied last April 08, 2026

We are human, and we occasionally make mistakes. When we do, we admit it, and we try to do whatever we can to make things right. But there was no such mistake in this instance. We promised to handle this client's ticket, which we properly did, but an administrative collection fee of $30 (called an "omni fee") was added as a result of this client allowing the ticket to fall into warrant status prior to hiring us. We immediately posted a bond to lift the warrant, and later handled the ticket itself in court. >>>>>>. Unfortunately, there is no legal defense (at least none that I am aware of) to these so called administrative "omni fees". And there certainly isn't a legal defense that could be legitimately pursued for less than the $30 cost to pay the fee itself. These fees aren't criminal in nature, so warrants are never issued for non-payment, but the government will not renew a driver's license until the fee is paid. So they pretty much always get their money - eventually. >>>>>>>. When we get hired on a ticket that has a $30 omni fee attached to it, we offer to forward the $30 fee to the omni fee collection agency at no charge to our clients if they give us the money to do so. Otherwise we instruct them how to pay the fee on their own. But I certainly don't pay the $30 out of my own pocket, anymore than I would do the jail sentence myself should a client of mine be unfortunate enough to be convicted of a more serious crime. >>>>>>. We explained all of this to this client, but she didn't like what we were telling her, and wanted us to pay her $30 omni fee out of my own pocket, which we wouldn't do. We had nothing to do with that fee - there is NEVER anything that we can do with these fees. The client just has to pay them (or not get their driver's license renewed.). >>>>>>. We have handled over 80,000 traffic citations since 1985, and in doing so, have never once been cited by the Texas State Bar for professional misconduct. So notwithstanding this client's complaint about having to pay the $30 omni fee before the state would renew her driver's license, we feel that we do a pretty good job on these matters. >>>>>>. I am very sorry that the government made her pay them $30 before they would renew her driver's license, but there was absolutely nothing I could do about it. >>>>>>. (You can't please everyone, no matter how hard you try.). >>>>>>. - John Gioffredi

See All Client Reviews