98 Client Reviews
Showing 41 - 45 of 45 reviews | Professionalism
Posted by -M | June 10, 2015
Look no further...money well spent-
Facing a reckless driving charge (Stafford - 61/30mph) I was rather motivated to find a competent & aggressive lawyer who would defend me in a creative manner. I researched many lawyers and found that the counsel at Price Benowitz, all had a common theme. They were effective and got results. Don't...
Posted by Marian | April 21, 2015
Results Oriented
Matt helped my husband and I with a terrible neighbor problem. Thanks to him, we were able to force the neighbor to behave, allowing us to sell the property and leave for greener pastures and better neighbors. Matt was aggressive and had a lot of experience with this type of problem. He understood...
Posted by anonymous | September 07, 2017 | Hired Attorney
Criminal Defense
My son was facing a mandatory (5) year sentence based on the charges and circumstances that were against him. However, Mr. Crowley's experience, knowledge, and attentiveness to the details led him to thoroughly research all information pertaining to my son's case ie.witnesses, statements, and argu...
Posted by anonymous | February 16, 2019 | Hired Attorney
Basically not interested in his client
Essentially, Matthew Crowley was referred to me after my lawyers were switched around. It took MULTIPLE tries for him to contact me, which he never did. After 3 phone calls, and the DAY BEFORE my trial, he decides to call me and asks why I am concerned and that nothing can happen until the day of the...
After a thorough review I do not appear to have received any of the communications described in this review, nor does this match up to any client I have had who I am aware of. I suspect this to be a fake and invite whoever wrote it to reach out to me directly.
Posted by Mark | December 28, 2017 | Hired Attorney
Not the Best DWI Attorney for the money
Hired Mr. Crowley to represent me but after paying him in full up front he had little time or patience to talk with me about my case. I waited 3 weeks in jail before he had time to drop by for 15 min to talk to me. Not much time for the Money I paid. He always had other clients he had to deal with....
I cannot comment on case specifics, but will observe a few general things. Sometimes it makes sense to remain in jail pending trial. This is sometimes referred to as tactical incarceration. The idea is, in a serious case where a client is counting on leniency from the prosecutor, to show contrition by getting some of the inevitable jail time out of the way. This may be to get less jail time, a lesser charge, or so that other charges will be dismissed. It is a choice made by the client on the advice of counsel. With that said, I file a bond motion in every case unless instructed not to do so for the reasons mentioned above. In cases where (this is a matter of public record) there is an arrest for a second DUI with a high BAC three days after conviction for a first DUI, there is grave danger of a very harsh jail sentence. Up to a year is available for the judge to impose. Far from receiving the "max," public record shows that the minimum required by law was served in this case (30 days) and the client released at the first hearing exactly as planned. I'm disappointed that you are unhappy given that things went exactly as anticipated and that the outcome was very good under the circumstances. I invite you to contact me directly to discuss this further.