Alexander Segal

It is amassing how eager are some people to post a fake review. One shall always wonder - what is the motive behind filing a review, which is clearly not written by an actual current or former client or anyone who worked with the attorney in the past? Well, take this review for instance. It provides no facts, no basis for the conclusions and no conclusions either. instead, it makes blunt statements purported to smear my good name. It says, I lost a "simple" case and did it on purpose. Several; questions come into mind: What would be the reason for an attorney to lose a "simple" case "on purpose" - to get a bad review from a disgruntled client? Does really a "simple" case exist in today's U.S. Immigration Law? Should one have the relevant expertise to determine whether the case is "simple?" If one does have the expertise, why would one need to pay a lawyer to deal with a "simple" case? if the point is to warn the public that the attorney in not competent or malicious, why to resort to the stereotypical charge of a "greedy lawyer" instead of providing actual reasons for the warning? I will leave these and other questions for the reader to answer. I trust in the common sense of the reader.