Overall Rating
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.

4.7 /5.0

52 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (48) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 11 - 12 of 12 reviews | Case Results

Posted by Kat | February 11, 2014

Brilliant Lawyer

Mr. Heideman represented me in a criminal case (traffic ticket), which is not something he normally does. He reviewed the law and was knowledgable enough to get my case dismissed. His argumentation and logic was impeccably presented in a respectful, yet assertive manner. I was in awe at his skill ...to think quickly on his feet and argue clearly and concisely.

Posted by Miya | August 19, 2019 | Hired Attorney

Not impressed

Although I appreciate Mr. Hiedeman for taking my case on a contingency basis, I wasn't impressed with how quickly he dumped it. He didn't think I had a case, I disagree. He comes across as a bully, so I found it difficult to communicate with him. It would have been helpful for me to obtain a better u...nderstanding of why my case, which was complex and difficult, wasn't worth his time. I would have liked to discuss the case with him in its entirety, not just from the view of the investigator's report. I've concluded that my case was worth fighting for, had I been able to afford his fees up front. Fair enough. But disappointing, nonetheless. One other thing. Mr. Heideman, without notifying me that he was no longer representing me, had someone from his office call me in the middle of the afternoon to advise me that 'today' (meaning by 5pm that day!) was the last day I had to appeal my case. So in the end, I wasn't given timely advice or service. If he had no intention of representing me, he should have given me a heads up long before the 2 hour window to the deadline. Yet again, once my case didn't matter to Mr. Heideman, I didn't matter to Mr. Heideman. I don't think it bothered him a bit that he cost me an opportunity to appeal my case. My experience of Justin Heideman is that he is the epitome of why attorneys are reviled in the United States.

Justin Heideman

Replied last August 19, 2019

Miya: I am stunned at this review. Specifically, we worked for free on your case as an accommodation to you. We took the case after you had already filed against a governmental entity, and we did so quickly because of pending potential deadlines. After we were able to obtain all of the relevant documentation it became abundantly clear that you did not have a viable cause of action. Again, we had not charged you anything, and we then reached out to you and explained the view we had of your claims. You were disappointed and wanted us to continue. I explained that there was nothing to continue with. Now, despite having paid nothing, you are complaining that we failed to serve you sufficiently, even though we could find no viable legal theory. The truly frustrating element of this review is your second paragraph - which is entirely false. We undertook the representation when the time frames were already pending, as I stated earlier. Each time a timeframe was received or discovered, we notified you on the date that the information was obtained. When the denial of your claim was issued we were informed that you had received a letter directly informing you of the denial. That letter contained your appellate deadline. As we obtained information regarding the appeal and confirmed that there was no viable claim we passed that information on as well. Of course, when your final day for appeal came, as a matter of courtesy, we contacted you to remind you of the fact. We did so because that is what responsible legal counsel does, they remind clients of their deadlines, even after they were initially informed not only by their counsel but also by the state of Utah in this case. Your review gives off the impression that this was your first notice. It absolutely was not. It was a reminder in case you were deciding to move forward despite our legal conclusion that the case was meritless. What is happening here is that you didn't like the fact your initial, personal, attempts were rejected by the state. Then you hired counsel, which took the case because of pending deadlines, without the benefit of a full review, to make sure your matter was not compromised by the passage of time, and after the review confirmed that the claim was meritless. So rather than accept that, you have decided to rail against the firm that worked for free on your matter.

See All Client Reviews