Overall Rating
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
4.3 /5.0
52 Client Reviews
Showing 6 - 9 of 9 reviews | Responsiveness
Posted by Steve | April 20, 2015
What an attorney should be!
Justin and his firm were hired to help me and my business partner with a sticky situation. From the very first meeting, we could tell how knowledgable he was and we knew he was the right attorney for us. Through the whole process, he has been there for us, which can be a hassle because I always hav...
Posted by anonymous | June 29, 2025 | Hired Attorney
Worst Attorney Ever!!!
A textbook example of a dishonest attorney. If you're facing a difficult time and need genuine legal support, look elsewhere. I made the mistake of trusting Justin, and it turned my already stressful situation into a nightmare. He'll say all the right things up front to gain your trust and secure you...
This is plainly not an actual client. Anyone who knows Heideman & Associates is aware that this firm offers direct cell phone access to its attorneys and that the firm's policy mandates a response to any text message on the same day it is received, as well as a return phone call within 24 hours. Mr. Heideman has received hundreds, if not thousands, of compliments over the years for his efforts to return calls and maintain communication. It is truly unfortunate when someone poses as a client in an effort to slander a person or business. This comment is most likely from an opposing party that was successfully prosecuted by the firm. Heideman & Associates appreciates and values all of its clients, and their successful track record speaks for itself.
Posted by anonymous | February 15, 2024
Never answered my question
I contacted this attorney a while back asking a few simple questions, but they wasted my time by never replying. If you are not interested in my case, please just say so instead of keeping me on the line without an answer. Thank you.
I must offer my humble apology. I do my very best to respond to each and every question, but have had some extensive - and unusually long - trials of late. During that period of time my ability to respond is compromised for obvious reasons. If you would like to ask your question again now, I will be able to address it. Warmest professional regards, Justin D. Heideman
Posted by Miya | August 19, 2019 | Hired Attorney
Not impressed
Although I appreciate Mr. Hiedeman for taking my case on a contingency basis, I wasn't impressed with how quickly he dumped it. He didn't think I had a case, I disagree. He comes across as a bully, so I found it difficult to communicate with him. It would have been helpful for me to obtain a better u...
Miya: I am stunned at this review. Specifically, we worked for free on your case as an accommodation to you. We took the case after you had already filed against a governmental entity, and we did so quickly because of pending potential deadlines. After we were able to obtain all of the relevant documentation it became abundantly clear that you did not have a viable cause of action. Again, we had not charged you anything, and we then reached out to you and explained the view we had of your claims. You were disappointed and wanted us to continue. I explained that there was nothing to continue with. Now, despite having paid nothing, you are complaining that we failed to serve you sufficiently, even though we could find no viable legal theory. The truly frustrating element of this review is your second paragraph - which is entirely false. We undertook the representation when the time frames were already pending, as I stated earlier. Each time a timeframe was received or discovered, we notified you on the date that the information was obtained. When the denial of your claim was issued we were informed that you had received a letter directly informing you of the denial. That letter contained your appellate deadline. As we obtained information regarding the appeal and confirmed that there was no viable claim we passed that information on as well. Of course, when your final day for appeal came, as a matter of courtesy, we contacted you to remind you of the fact. We did so because that is what responsible legal counsel does, they remind clients of their deadlines, even after they were initially informed not only by their counsel but also by the state of Utah in this case. Your review gives off the impression that this was your first notice. It absolutely was not. It was a reminder in case you were deciding to move forward despite our legal conclusion that the case was meritless. What is happening here is that you didn't like the fact your initial, personal, attempts were rejected by the state. Then you hired counsel, which took the case because of pending deadlines, without the benefit of a full review, to make sure your matter was not compromised by the passage of time, and after the review confirmed that the claim was meritless. So rather than accept that, you have decided to rail against the firm that worked for free on your matter.