104 Client Reviews
Showing 51 - 55 of 104 reviews
Posted by anonymous | August 30, 2017 | Hired Attorney
Waddington Made Fools of CID and prosecution
If you don't use Mr. Waddington as your defence lawyer you are doing yourself a disservice. I could not recommend him more. I was bullied by my command and some dirty prosecutors for long enough when I hired the Gonzales Waddington firm. What a difference it made. I was finally able to sleep at night...
Posted by Dave | August 21, 2017 | Hired Attorney
DO NOT HIRE UNLESS the case is related to sexual assault/rape.
I hired Mike Waddington for a positive urinalysis case with an extremely low nanogram level, no evidence and a professionally reviewed report for prescribed medication. Months went by and as the Board of Inquiry date came near, it was clear that no preparation had been done except by me. I paid Mik...
Our firm has successfully defended numerous drug cases. Defending any case becomes more difficult when a client continues to engage in criminal misconduct. The reviewer misstated the facts of his case. Yes, he received an OTH. But, this was not a simple low nanogram urinalysis case. He was discharged for 4 separate drug incidents. He tested positive for cocaine. Months later, he tested positive for PCP (angel dust). In addition, he was arrested for possession of PCP (months before the PCP urinalysis). His two NJPs, board proceedings, and arrest record are public records and can be obtained by a FOIA request. If you read the case file, you will see evidence of drug crimes that span many months. Background: This client was a caucasian male officer that worked in a highly classified job, vital to our National Security. He hired us after testing positive for cocaine. His urine was reverified. It contained cocaine and it was his urine. At this point, our goal was to avoid court martial, jail time, a Federal felony conviction, and a punitive discharge (a Dismissal). In a separate incident, he was arrested by local police with a known drug trafficker. The police found PCP in our client's possession. He was charged in Maryland with that crime. On a different occasion, a different Maryland police department stopped him with the same drug trafficker in a public park. According to the police report, he looked and acted like he was high on drugs. The police officer learned that he was a military officer and notified his superiors instead of charging him. They did write a police report describing the incident. At that time, he was facing 10 years in prison, a dismissal, and a felony conviction. His command took him to NJP. We worked on the NJP and he was acquitted of one of the drug charges. After the first NJP, the client tested positive AGAIN, this time for PCP. Statements made by our client came back to hurt us when he tested positive for PCP. Now, he faced 15 years in prison, a felony conviction, and dismissal. We were involved during this entire process. The command decided to give him NJP and send him to a board rather than court martial him. He elected NJP over a court martial. At his NJP he did not dispute the drug test results. In the end, he was sent to an Officer Show Cause Board. The standard of proof at a board is low and the rules of evidence do not apply. At the board, our hands were tied for various reasons that I cannot explain because it violates attorney client privilege. Bottom line: Witnesses did not testify on behalf of this client. The client did not testify in his defense. I have helped hundreds of clients facing serious jail time and saved many people’s lives. Not every case ends in a full acquittal. Avoiding jail, a felony record, and a dismissal were wins in this client. In any case, if someone hires us and continues to commit alleged misconduct, especially with drugs, it makes retention or a favorable discharge much more difficult. In a case of repeated drug use, clients who are willing to enter rehab have a much better chance of getting a General or Honorable Discharge. I wish this individual the best of luck with his future and hope he is able to get his life back on track.
Posted by anonymous | August 13, 2017 | Hired Attorney
"Will the defense and accused please stand for the verdict..."
I was accused of an Article 120 violation. I was interrogated by investigators for over 2 hours after I told them repeatedly that I did not do what was alleged. After that, I was "booked" and then put on hold from my current position immediately, which also prevented me from moving forward in my ca...
Posted by anonymous | May 03, 2017 | Hired Attorney
Canary in a coal mine
I can't exactly remember how I came across Mr. Waddington, but I watched some YouTube clippings of him and decided to set up a phone consultation. I was being charged with 4 sex crimes and 2 other felonies by the United States Army. Unbeknownst, they charged me without even having evidence back to so...
Posted by Adam | February 20, 2017 | Hired Attorney
Thankful Army Retiree
Mr. Waddington is by far the best military lawyer anyone could ask for. I retained his services two years ago regarding a BAH fraud case that was causing me insurmountable despair and grief. After 19 years in the Army, I was about to lose everything I worked so hard for, personally and professionally...