30 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 4 of 4 reviews | Ethics & Professional Responsibility
Posted by Ken | April 05, 2019
Understanding, patient, honest
I spoke with Charles about an issue I was having, he took the time to clearly understand my needs. After speaking with him for almost an hour, he put me in touch with the right people to solve my problem. Do not hesitate to contact Charles if you feel you have been treated poorly by an attorney, you...
Posted by Mark and Peg | June 19, 2014
A lawyer that seems sincere and honest
I contacted attorney Kazarian about a personal injury case. I was represented by another attorney that we didn't have faith in. On a Tuesday evening at 7pm he had spent over an hour on the phone answering questions that we had concerning our attorney that we weren't happy with. Kazarian law offices...
Posted by Gene | November 06, 2013
great trusted attorney
I received several consultations from Attorney Kazarian. All situations involved legal malpractice in two different areas of law. Unfortunately, with the number of attorneys in this state it is not easy sometimes to find one that combines the knowledge, honesty, and compassion. I believe attorney Kaz...
Posted by anonymous | June 04, 2015
Disappointed with this attorney
This attorney charged me $1,200 for a case assessment and in the initial meeting stated that he would take my case on contingency. One month later when he finally got back to me, he stated that he would only take the case for a substantial amount of money upfront, to take all the risk out of the case...
I absolutely did not inform the client that we would take the case on a pure contingent fee basis, and it is unfortunate that I was unable to help this client understand that the complexities and the limited available recovery in the potential case did not merit this office taking all of the risk, and for us to take on the case we would require the client to participate in the costs going forward. We frequently handle cases on a pure contingent fee basis (thus taking ALL of the risk), but this client's case did not merit that approach. The client, a non-lawyer, decided that his own opinion of the contract law issues in the case trumped mine, and I invited him to obtain a second opinion.