Legal advice on Qui tam actions and employment law

I'm a MD who worked with another MD in a Pain Management Practice for 3 years. He was the owner. I did not like that way he was practicing so I decided to leave. I gave notice but was terminated shortly after giving notice out of spite. Because of the sudden termination, I did not get to complete all of my patient notes before leaving. One such note I have come to discover was completed by him and signed by him so it could be billed. This patient found me after a year and followed me to my new practice and I discovered the issue when the notes were faxed over as part of the medical records transfer. The note in question was for a procedure on a date and at a facility that I know I was present for but the other physician wasn't. Note was opened under my name as MAs frequently do prior to patient arrival. But the other physician obviously filled out the procedure description, which he didn't perform, and then signed it. An added kicker is that my patient recalls having called the office that day and cancelling the procedure so the other physician forged and signed a note opened under my name for a appt/procedure that didn't even occur. And yes, it appears it was paid.

I was wrongfully fired. I work for one of the biggest shelters in the city. For years the managers been telling us Supervisors to check in clients that are not physically in the shelter to make it look like we have no beds available. When a client doesn't show up for their bed in the shelter those beds are supposed to be dropped and cleaned for someone who's waiting at the Resource center for a one night bed. We are suppose to keep the accountabilities high. So they can keep the fundings from the city. They have another scam cheating staff with overtime hours and vacation hours. Our managers are the accountants and they are not qualified. The upper levels has been bribing staff who was hurt on the job giving them a little lum sum so they don't file workers comp. I emailed one lawyers agency and they didn't want to take it. I thought I have a good scandal case. What should I do?

My bosses over the course of my employment have done several things of which I am certain our illegal, is there anywhere I can anonymously contact to alert the activity? Anonymously as so I'm not fired for bringing up legal concerns

My former employer a health insurance broker is defrauding the government by using unlicensed people to sell health insurance to clients and then defrauding the federal government by uploading those plans on to healthcare.gov in order to qualify for subsidies under the affordable care act or obamacare. Do I have a valid qui tam case.

If I file or threaten to file a lawsuit against my employer and, in retaliation, my employer terminates me or forces me to quit, isn't that a violation of my civil rights regardless of the subject matter of the legal action? (ie: if the legal action isn't employment related, wouldn't it still be illegal for my employer to retaliate against me for it since I have a legal right to threaten and or carry out legal action against them?)

I worked as a billing specialist and I strongly believe i was part of a fraud scheme billing for services to the wrong patients and for services never giving to the patient

About a year ago, I was forced to resign from my role as a sales rep at a large, publicly traded med device company shortly after reporting fraudulent activity to the company's Compliance Officer. The company had improperly leaked my report to the employees involved in the fraud, and strongly suggested that I resign to avoid the awkward relationships (I have a legal audio recording of this convo w/ HR). Fast forward to now, I'm reading in the news that the company has since agreed to a $14 mil settlement with the DOJ for False Claims Act violations that are almost identical to the fraud that I had reported. Did the company have a legal obligation to tell me about the DOJ's investigation into the same fraud that I had reported before I signed a separation agreement? Should I have been afforded FCA protection from retaliation (i.e. being forced to resign) since I reported fraud that could have and should have aided in the DOJ's investigation into False Claims Act violations? I have an abundance of evidence to prove all of my claims of fraud and the subsequent retaliation for having reported the fraud. The company is based in California, but I lived and worked in Texas.

About a year ago, I was forced to resign from my role as a sales rep at a large, publicly traded med device company shortly after reporting fraudulent activity to the company's Compliance Officer. The company had improperly leaked my report to the employees involved in the fraud, and strongly suggested that I resign to avoid the awkward relationships (I have a legal audio recording of this convo w/ HR). Fast forward to now, I'm reading in the news that the company has since agreed to a $14 mil settlement with the DOJ for False Claims Act violations that are almost identical to the fraud that I had reported. Did the company have a legal obligation to tell me about the DOJ's investigation into the same fraud that I had reported before I signed a separation agreement? Should I have been afforded FCA protection from retaliation (i.e. being forced to resign) since I reported fraud that could have and should have aided in the DOJ's investigation into False Claims Act violations? I have an abundance of evidence to prove all of my claims of fraud and the subsequent retaliation for having reported the fraud. The company is based in California, but I lived and worked in Texas.

In District court, I filed a case against corporation defendant Y in a pending Whistleblower, Qui Tam & wrongful termination case; Def Y sent me answers to my initial request for production of documents;Y filed motion2dismiss( MTD). After 21 days can I request the court for defaulted judgement against Y based on Fed R. Civ P. 55? I filed objection to def Y's MTD and both are under court submission. Is there basis for filing motion for "request for defaulted judgement" against def Y. Thx

Qui Tam lawsuit filed against a person in his official capacity and his employer. Employee was dismissed in his official capacity (as duplicative to claims against his employer) and is threatening to sue for defamation if I continue to provide testimony regarding his actions in the remaining suit against his employer. His actions form the basis of the qui tam. Is he threatening a SLAPP?