Legal advice on Car Accidents in North Carolina

I'd imagine the injured plaintiff tells their version but if there is a defendant, witnesses and experts when would it be likely the defendant testifies (after Plaintiff or after all Plaintiff's witnesses and/or expert). Im defendant and wonder where I fall in line. I uninsured

The situation is as follows: "Car A" is ahead of "Car B". Both cars are traveling the same direction on a divided highway, with 2 lanes available, one car in either lane. Car B is in the left lane and wishes to pass by Car A, who is currently in the right lane. Car A pulls to the left and begins driving in both lanes, maintaining that course for an extended period of time. Car B continues travel in their lane until Car A and Car B collide. In the given scenario, Car A may or may not have a turn signal on. If this changes the answer, please include that. Also, Car A is intentionally blocking the lane for Car B. I left that out because intention can be hard to prove. If this matters, please include that. Car B may or may not have intentionally continued to maintain course and speed, knowing the cars would collide if Car A didn't move. If this matters, please include that. This is purely hypothetical and in no way is being used as official legal advice. Just wondering how the law would look at it.

I was rear ended inside an automated car wash with enough force to snap my head backwards. There is damage to my vehicle bumper and undercarriage.

I bought a car today before having hired a car inspector in the morning. The inspector gave me his report by phone. Nothing abnormal all good in global. He is supposed to give me the report tomorrow by email with pictures. When arrive home I realized the neon on the main headlight doesn't work, and neither does the bottom light. I informed him about the issue. I signed the purchase of the vehicle as is. So who is responsible? is there an insurance who cover this negligence ? Thanks

I got a brake inspection done on 7/15, the brakes were flushed out and I got new rotors. On 7/22 my brakes went out while my husband was driving. We had to stop using the E-brake. I ended up near a triple A, and they sent pictures to me and told me it was firestones fault. There was a wallowed out bolt in the caliber and it was cracked, and the brake line was bent to the point of breaking by the 22nd. Firestone won’t communicate about this, but I paid almost $700. And then at AAA I paid nearly $900. Should I be able to get reimbursed? I didn’t want Firestone handling my car ever again, especially since we could have lost our lives driving a car without brakes. Should I pursue getting my money back? Having to pay all this has been a big financial burden for us. Or is it just a waste of time? Thank you.

My 15 year old was in a car accident and taken to ER in C Spine. CAT scan was done and he was released with ibuprofen. He has no more problems after the 2 days of pain. They offered us $1300 then raised to $1500 but no more. Is this something I should counter again?

I caused the accident in a parking lot 3 months ago. Thought i was on the brake but it was actually the gas. I hit a parked car which went into another parked car. My policy was issued in NJ but the accident was in NC. NJ is no fault, NC is at fault. Would this fall under NJ rules or NC rules if someone now claims she was a passenger in the parked car and got hurt

While dealership had my truck in their shop to fix a problem. While test driving, they ran into someone at the stop light and had to replace my front bumper. Is there anything I can do?

I was in a 3 car accident. The at fault driver turned into oncoming traffic without yielding and was struck by a car resulting in the at fault driver's vehicle to be thrown into mine and hitting me head on at a stop sign as I was waiting to turn. I was injured and going through treatment. I will be seeking representation soon because of the low offer that was sent from the insurance company. My question is if the at fault driver's insurance only says their driver is 80% liable does that mean I'm only entitled to max of 80% recovery if I was to hypothetically be awarded the policy limits even though I was 0% liable because I was a 3rd party or does that just pertain to the driver that was 20% liable? Would I have to sue the other driver's insurance because he was 20% liable? Thanks

I’m asking only because I was injured on the job 9 months ago and didn’t receive treatment but, I did receive 3 tests well after the injury occurred. Then 2.5 weeks again I was injured on the job again due to faulty vehicle equipment causing a collision which I have been charged with. I chose not to hire an attorney for the first injury because 1.5 year’s earlier I had settled a claim with my former employers insurance co and I didn’t think that was handled well.