A consecutive sentence results in a longer sentence than a concurrent sentence. If you imagine two ice cubes, one that will melt in five years and the other in four, under consecutive sentencing the prison officials wait until the five year sentence is completed before counting time off of the four year sentence. In our example the two sentences served consecutively will result in an actual time of nine years minus good time. Sometimes the law requires consecutive sentences such as a new crime that is committed while serving another sentence in prison or jail, firearm enhancements and habitual offender time. Often however the sentencing judge simply wants to impose a greater sentence and decides upon consecutive terms to make the punishment greater.
A concurrent sentence results in a shorter sentence than a consecutive sentence. Using the two ice cubes, they both begin melting at the same time and after four years, the smaller cube has completely melted and the other cube only has one year left to go. So in our example concurrent sentences for five and four years will result in five years of actual time.
Additional resources provided by the author
State v. Triggs, 281 P.3d 1256, 2012 -NMCA- 68 (N.M. App., 2012)
Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on
their profile in addition to the information we collect from state
bar associations and other organizations that license legal
professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo
with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do
What determines Avvo Rating?
Experience & background
Years licensed, work experience, education
Legal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awards
Legal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagements
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in .
Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.