Part 1: Introduction: Larceny on the Rise?
Part 2: "Larceny" Explained in Simple Terms
Part 3: Petit Larceny Penalties
Part 4: Grand Larceny Penalties
Part 5: Why does "Value" Matter?
Part 6: Case Examples (Insufficient Evidence to Convict)
Part 7: Case Examples (Sufficient Evidence to Convict)
As far as a blemish on one's criminal record is concerned, it does not matter whether the charge is for petit larceny or grand larceny, because both are criminal offenses: either charge will remain on an adult record forever. If any type of guilty verdict is rendered, then expungement will be nearly impossible.
According to recent data released by the Department of Justice, 12,825,510 people reported that they were a victim of a property crime in 2011. In 2002, that figure was higher, at 14 million. In 2010, the numbers declined to just 11.6 million.
But note: the above figures only account for property theft not including auto theft or household burglary. Nor do these numbers include robbery: larceny is not considered to be a violent crime, because when larceny is accompanied by force, threats, or intimidation, then it is charged as robbery (a crime against a person, not solely property).
The statutes from The Code of Virginia dealing with larceny include (but are not limited to) the following:
The larceny charge may include the main Code section (likely one of the two listed above), as well as another notation, such as:
The crime of petit larceny refers to instances involving:
The crime of grand larceny refers to instances involving:
If the charge is grand larceny, then it is considered a felony.
Petit larceny is a Class 1 Misdemeanor in Virginia. Petit larceny is the less serious larceny offense, but is still considered to be the most serious type of misdemeanor in Virginia. As a Class 1 misdemeanor, the judge is authorized to sentence a convicted person to up to:
A larceny "attempt" is punishable just the same. This is true for petit and grand larceny.
Grand larceny is covered by a separate statute,but the same definition of larceny is applicable (see Part 2 of this guide).
Grand larceny is punishable by:
In the jury or court’s discretion trying the case, it may sentence the defendant to
A lawyer should be consulted by someone faced with either grand or petit larceny: a legal professional with criminal defense experience can explain to you the difference between:
“Value" is an important aspect to the crime of larceny. To be charged with petit larceny, the items involved must have some value. As long as the items have some value, then the Commonwealth Attorney (prosecution) need not prove the precise value.
For a grand larceny conviction, however, the Commonwealth must offer proof of the value:
In cases involving goods valued around the $200 threshold (or $5, if taken from a person), many people often ask, "who or what determines the value?" Before we cover this question, have a look at what the Code of Virginia says with regards to instances when:
First, in the case of a grand larceny charge, if it turns out that the value is actually less than $200 (for an item taken not from a person), then the law provides:
“[T]he jury may find the accused guilty of petit larceny."
Second, if the charge is petit larceny, as opposed to grand larceny, then another Code section provides:
“[T]he jury may find the accused guilty; and upon a conviction . . . the accused shall be sentenced for petit larceny."
Who can prove the value?
This may come as a surprise, but opinion testimony of a non-expert who does not own the property can still offer admissible testimony as to the property value...but only if:
Witnesses / victims testified in court that the items found in the defendant’s vehicle were the same items they noticed and reported stolen. On the same day that the items were reported stolen, they were found in the defendant’s vehicle.
A neighbor heard something coming from the victim’s house, and then saw the defendant leaving the scene. The neighbor noticed a cord protruding from the defendant’s pants, presumably coming out of his pocket. When the defendant realized he was being watched by the neighbor, he let out a slur of curse words. At the same trial, the defendant gave a conflicting account as to his whereabouts that evening. Despite all of the evidence in this case being circumstantial, it was enough to convict.
A man entered a store and removed two containers of ointment from their display boxes on the shelf. He then put the two containers in his pockets, but did not leave the store. He was properly convicted, according to the court, because he did put the items in his pocket, and also made a statement, he was being “stupid." The court found this enough to indicate the presence of criminal intent.
There was no proof beyond a reasonable doubt in a case where the evidence placed the accused in the same area where the theft took place, as well as the general areas where the items stolen were found…but even together, it created only a mere suspicion and not sufficient evidence to convict.
A case coming down to the “value" of the tools for a grand larceny conviction: a witness testified that the tools in question were purchased in 1986 or 1987 and that she did not know the price, and the estimated replacement cost was $540. But the witness was not the owner of the tools, and she did not testify what effects wear and tear would have on the value of the tools…if any. … The estimation did not properly establish the current value of the stolen goods, reflecting effects of wear and tear. Thus, the evidence was not sufficient to prove the value of the tools was greater than $200.
The intent to “permanently deprive" the owner is necessary for a larceny conviction. In one case, the defendant borrowed a tool and never asserted his own right to ownership, and also always stated he intended to return the tool. When he could not find the drill (for reasons not clear), he paid the owner for the price of the drill. This evidence was not sufficient to support a larceny charge.
If you have been charged with any criminal offense, or if you are not sure whether your offense is civil, criminal, or a mere infraction, please call one of a local Virginia or Fairfax criminal lawyer, or our Fairfax criminal defense attorney. Brenton D. Vincenzes helps advocate for those accused of committing crimes and traffic violations in Northern Virginia, and would be happy to talk to you about your case at no cost, and with no-obligation.
Disclaimer:Nothing contained in this guide constitutes legal advice. It is information, and as such, is for informational purposes only. No attorney-client relationship exists by way of reading this guide, and nothing herein should be relied upon. Instead, speak to a qualified legal professional who practices criminal law in the jurisdiction where your case is to be heard.
Criminal defense Criminal charges Crime classifications Felony crime Misdemeanor crime Criminal charges for burglary Criminal charges for theft Criminal charges for robbery Defenses for criminal charges Criminal sentencing Criminal record Expungement of criminal record Violent crime