Skip to main content

Surgeon Must See What He Cuts; New York Medical Malpractice Attorney Gerry Oginski Explains

Posted by attorney Gerald Oginski

There are times during surgery when the surgeon will be unable to get a good visual field because of significant bleeding or even scar tissue. In that instance, the doctor has an obligation not to cut something he cannot see.

You would think that his common sense. The reality is that if the surgeon cuts something he cannot see, there's a risk that he may cut an adjacent organ and not recognize it.

For example, a surgeon might cut into the bowel accidentally and if the hole is small enough, may not recognize the damage intraoperatively, during surgery. Instead, the bowel injury may only show itself days later as the patient is trying to recuperate.

Although injury to other adjacent organs may be a known risk of the surgical procedure, the surgeon still has an obligation not to cut something he cannot see.

In a medical malpractice case in New York, simply because an injury or complication occurred during a surgical procedure does not in and of itself mean that there was wrongdoing.

We are required to have a medical expert confirm that there was (1) wrongdoing, (2) the wrongdoing caused injury and (3) the injury is significant and/or permanent.

Watch the video to learn more...

Additional resources provided by the author

Author of this guide:

Was this guide helpful?

Avvo personal injury email series

Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.

Recommended articles about Personal injury

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer