When can a short sale deficiency be enforced in Florida? This has been a topic of discussion as the legislature in 2013 amended the law that makes the answer to that question unclear. Here we try to answer that question.
Short Sale Deficiency Like Foreclosure Deficiency?
One of the prominent questions regarding mortgage deficiencies and the new law on Florida's statute of limitations for enforcement of a mortgage deficiency is whether it applies to a Florida short sale. There has been uncertainty as to its application to short sales because the new law, which went into effect July 1, 2013, does not specifically mention "short sales" as one of the types of "deficiencies" subject to the one-year statute of limitations. On the other hand, another part of the same legislative bill HB 87 (2013) deals with the foreclosure statute. In that statute it talks about how a deficiency is measured and includes in the bill that a deficiency includes the shortage after a short sale. I addressed this issue originally in my article DEFICIENCY JUDGMENT BARRED AFTER 1 YEAR - CAN IT APPLY TO SHORT SALES
So the outstanding question has been, why didn't the legislature include the short sale transaction term when it limited the enforcement of a deficiency? Why didn't they make it clear? Thus, does a short sale deficiency have the same one-year limitations for enforcement as a foreclosure deficiency?
The new Florida Statute 702.06 says: 702.06 Deficiency decree; common-law suit to recover deficiency.--In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or hereafter executed the entry of a deficiency decree for any portion of a deficiency, should one exist, shall be within the sound discretion of the court; however, in the case of an owner-occupied residential property, the amount of the deficiency may not exceed the difference between the judgment amount, or in the case of a short sale, the outstanding debt, and the fair market value of the property on the date of sale. For purposes of this section, there is a rebuttable presumption that a residential property for which a homestead exemption for taxation was granted according to the certified rolls of the latest assessment by the county property appraiser, before the filing of the foreclosure action, is an owner-occupied residential property. The complainant shall also have the right to sue at common law to recover such deficiency, unless the court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment. So here we have the term "deficiency decree" defined, and we know that a deficiency decree can include the shortage not paid to the bank in a short sale. [Note that we are only speaking about instances where the bank agrees to the short sale but does NOT agree to the forgiveness of the unpaid portion of the remaining monies due to the bank.]
And the Next Statute Says....
Next we have the other portion of the bill, which is Florida Statute 95.11, which states, 95.11 Limitations other than for the recovery of real property.--Actions other than for recovery of real property shall be commenced as follows: (5) WITHIN ONE YEAR.--(h) An action to enforce a claim of a deficiency related to a note secured by a mortgage against a residential property that is a one-family to four-family dwelling unit. The limitations period shall commence on the day after the certificate is issued by the clerk of court or the day after the mortgagee accepts a deed in lieu of foreclosure.
Here we have two parts to examine. First we are looking at a "note secured by a mortgage". This part of the language works fine for a short sale as it is a short payment of a note secured by a mortgage. The next part we look at is the word "deficiency", which in this statute is not defined - but it is in Florida Statute 702.06 and in that statue it says a deficiency includes the amounts unpaid resulting from a short sale. So now the two statutes can be reconciled. A deficiency can include a short sale shortage or a mortgage foreclosure shortage. The one year limitation law applies to enforcement of a deficiency. So that leaves only one part that gives us a problem. The limitations statute says the clock starts to run when the "certificate" is issued by the clerk of court or the time the lender accepts a deed in lieu of foreclosure. [Another discussion is whether this means "Certificate of Sale" or "Certificate of Title" or "Certificate of Disbursements".] It does not mention the day the lender accepts the short sale funds. So should a short sale be included?
So The Answer Is............
My answer is Yes, it should. I say this because excluding its use would leave no time start for a short sale deficiency. Since short sales were included in the term "deficiency", a common meaning and application must be made. The courts are not to write legislation, but were the clear intention is that all roads lead to the same conclusion, that common conclusion should be applied. Here that common conclusion is that a short sale deficiency matures upon the lender receiving its shorted funds, much like the lender getting the deed in lieu of foreclosure or the Certificate being issued - in each case being the same event of the lender receiving the consideration (money or title to the property) from the "event". I am sure others may disagree. But to disagree is to warp the common meaning of words and express mechanics of the foreclosure process or short sale agreement. Bending common application of words is not how laws should be interpreted.
Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on
their profile in addition to the information we collect from state
bar associations and other organizations that license legal
professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo
with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do
What determines Avvo Rating?Experience & background
Years licensed, work experience, education
Legal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awards
Legal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagements
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in .
Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.