1. Without the loans, many seniors would have been forced to sell the homes anyway, due to the inability to pau maintenance costs, existing loans or taxes and insurance;
2. No one forced these seniors to take the loans and spend the money they received, even if spent frivolously;
3. That a majority of foreclosures occur not due to defaults relating to non-payment of taxes or insurance but due to either abandonment of the home (residing in the home is a condition of getting and keeping the loan) or death;
4. Claiming that the heirs lost out on getting the home due to the reverse mortgage is a false premise, because it presupposes that the heirs deserve the home even though their parents needed and got to enjoy the benefits of the money; and
5. Many foreclosures occur simply because many reverse mortgages were granted before the crash, and the monies given were based on a higher pre-crash value. Combined with the accrued interest over 10 to 15 years (a key to how these work, seniors pay nothing during the term of the loan) and all the costs of sale (as high as 8% for real estate commissions, taxes, transfer taxes and title insurance), there is little to no equity left to interest the heirs or the estate to consider selling the properties.
As a Florida HUD Commissioner, I have handled hundreds of reverse mortgage foreclosures for HUD. In only one instance was a foreclosure based on the failure to pay taxes. All other cases were either abandonment of the home or death. HUD is only obligated to wait one year after abandonment of the home or death to begin a foreclosure action, but in all cases, HUD gave the family more time to decide whether to sell or walk away. In all my years, I have never received a complaint from a senior or beneficiary that HUD has stolen their home.
There are several criticisms of the reverse mortgage program. High upfront costs are an issue and frequently not properly discussed with borrowers. Interest rates are higher than conventional loans. High pressure sales tactics (including late night tv ads) have encouraged seniors to take out reverse mortgages, spend the money on vacations and gifts, without consideration of the ability to pay and maintain the property going forward.
Latest changes to the HUD Reverse Mortgage Program
As a result of the number of reverse mortgage foreclosures, there was a revamping of the HUD program in 2017 to address such issues. First, the mortgage insurance premiums charged to fund the government’s guarantee of the loan has changed. Instead of a floating premium of up to 2.5% based on the amount advanced at closing and in the loan’s first year, a lump sum of 2% is taken at closing. This could result in higher premiums for some borrowers.
However, the monthly mortgage insurance premium has been reduced from 1.25% to 0.5%, saving borrowers on the accrued monthly charges at a rate of about $166 for each $50,000 borrowed. The new rules will benefit borrowers who use their available funds at closing, but likely cost seniors who open a reverse mortgage as a line of credit for future use without drawing out fund.
In addition, the new guidelines have reduced the amount that can be borrowed. The maximum amount is a complicated formula based on the value of the home, the age of the borrower and the interest rate. Lowering the amount borrowed will likely reduce the number of foreclosures, benefiting both seniors and the guarantee fund.
A reverse mortgage can be a great tool for many homeowners, but it is a program that should be carefully reviewed to insure that it fits an individual’s needs. Discussions with a cpa, your children and a HUD loan counselor are a must before taking out a reverse mortgage.
Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on
their profile in addition to the information we collect from state
bar associations and other organizations that license legal
professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo
with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do
What determines Avvo Rating?
Experience & background
Years licensed, work experience, education
Legal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awards
Legal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagements
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in .
Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.