Over the years, medical malpractice law in Washington has become a thing of much debate. Considering the fact that Washington is a somewhat liberal state and contains all manner of judges and attorneys who have conflicting views on the very nature of medical malpractice law in Washington, it is not surprising that so much debate takes place and that so many individuals are content to argue the point in a court of law. When any patient makes the attempt to sue for medical malpractice, it is only natural for them to seek out an attorney. It is also only natural for attorneys to argue their case with fervor and zeal, causing all manner of difficulty in interpreting the letter of the law as more and more attorneys and physicians conduct themselves in a battle over legal wrangling. It is not surprising that the law itself has shown a tendency to evolve, following precedent set by these types of legal rulings.
Washington State Tort Law Statute of Limitations Three years from date of original injury or one year after injury was discovered. After eight years from the original injury, a suit may not be brought. Damage Award Limits No specific limits set. Damages awarded for noneconomic damages cannot exceed formulation of average annual wage and reasonable life expectancy of injured. Joint Defendant Liability Proportionate liability for defendants, except in cases where defendents are found to be acting jointly with others.
Expert Witness No specific limitations on witness
Attorney Fees Determined by the court for both parties.
As long as medical malpractice law in Washington continues to be the subject of much debate, it will very likely continue to evolve to reflect that of the precedent-setting rulings that have occurred over the years. As more and more precedent is continually set, the future will very likely see some subtle changes in the nature of the law itself. As long as these subtle changes continue to occur, it is only a matter of time before the evolution of the law becomes a matter of public debate and curiosity among physicians and attorneys alike, as well as those plaintiffs who are involved in the definition of medical malpractice law and Washington itself. With so much debate, it is almost impossible to predict the outcome in any particular debate. This difficulty in understanding the raging debate involving medical malpractice law in Washington will very likely end with individuals and plaintiffs seeking legal counsel for their curiosities and questions involving medical malpractice law in Washington.
As a patient, the medical malpractice law in Washington provides for those who are worse off after seeking treatment than they were before to hold their physicians accountable. Consequently, Washington requires a set of standards for medical malpractice insurance on the part of the physicians themselves. Without this insurance, the physicians cannot legally operate in the state, as they require protections from the individual plaintiffs to continue to operate.
If you have questions or have sustained a medical injury, consult with an attorney who can best advise you on your situation.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.