Defending Professional and Occupational Licenses in California: Character Evidence Is Critical
After decades of practice in the field of administrative law, the partners of License Advocates Law Group LLP have seen, time after time, that every occupational and professional licensing case can be strengthened by some very straightforward actions by the licensee or applicant even after the initial denial of a license or after disciplinary charges have been brought by the State. This Legal Guide discusses the Critical Task of preparing persuasive and comprehensive character evidence for defending a California occupational or professional licensing case.
Most license applicants and licensees who undertake a challenge of the denial of a license, or initiate a defense against a license revocation or restriction, have an intuitive sense that part of the process involves making a persuasive showing of good character, competence, and integrity. But what most don’t realize is that the laws of the State of California specify exactly what kind of evidence is relevant and material for this purpose. Even more important and less understood is the fact that California law requires that the State licensing agency give full consideration to this evidence. This is a vitally important right, one that can have a powerful effect on the outcome of the administrative law proceeding that determines the result of a licensing case. The task in administrative law is straight-forward, and the results are often predictable because the law spells out exactly what evidence is relevant and persuasive on character, fitness and “moral" issues, and, critically, compels the licensing agency and the Administrative Law Judge to give weight to that evidence. So, for example, if the licensee or license applicant offers into evidence admissible and credible character references from half a dozen persons, and if the licensing agency has no competing or rebutting evidence on the subject of character to overcome that evidence, then the fact of good character is established by operation of law and that evidence of good character must be a factor in the ultimate decision.
Skilled licensing attorneys can make compelling and substantial showings of their clients’ present good character with even a modest quantum of affirmative evidence. So it is essential, well in advance of the administrative hearing, to identify, collect, organize, and prepare for evidentiary presentation the mitigation and rehabilitation evidence that will be introduced to support the licensee or license applicant at the hearing. Much of this work can and should be done by the client—the licensee or license applicant—not only to reduce the costs for attorney time, but because the affected person is closest to the ground in these matters—has a better grasp of what may be available and useful than any “outsider" could possibly bring to bear—and will inevitably produce a stronger and broader package.
Every licensing agency in California, as required by law, has adopted written evidentiary standards for mitigation and rehabilitation. Most of them are operationally and functionally identical, and almost all of them are found in Title 16 of the ** California Code of Regulations**(formerly the CA Administrative Code). Many of the mitigation and rehabilitation criteria are also set forth in the Business & Professions Code. (See, as examples: Dept of Real Estate at CCR, title 10, section 2911; Dept of Motor Vehicles at CCR, title 13, section 440.04.)
Virtually all of the State agencies’ criteria for rehabilitation require, as a starting point, consideration of the circumstances of the act or acts on which the license discipline or denial is based. So, the first considerations are:
the nature and severity of the act(s) or crime(s) on which the denial or proposed discipline is based (and especially whether the acts involved violence or a threat of violence to others); and
circumstances of the crime or act that suggest that repetition is unlikely.
The next considerations are:
any evidence of any misconduct committed subsequent to the act underlying the discipline or license denial;
the applicant’s or licensee’s total criminal record;
activities since the crime, such as therapy or education, that indicate changed behavior;
the amount of time that has passed since the act(s) or crime(s) at issue;
compliance with any terms of parole, probation, or restitution for the offense underlying the license denial or discipline;
evidence of honesty and truthfulness in the application for license and interviews during the licensing agency’s investigation; and
All of these factors are sufficiently elastic and comprehensive as to enable all credible license applicants and licensees a meaningful opportunity to make a strong and wide-ranging showing of rehabilitation and current good character.
Even where there is not sufficient or satisfactory evidence of good character, there is ample time before your hearing to build compelling and persuasive character evidence andmaterially improve the evidence to be introduced at the hearing. So, in those critical months before the hearing, if the evidence of good character and fitness for licensing is lacking, implementing these straightforward measures of self-help will strengthen the posture of the licensee or applicant case:
Find a job. Do well at the job, particularly with respect to attendance, and ask the supervisor for a brief written attestation to your attendance, attitude, and quality of work.
Renew or improve family connections. Get current on child support and child visitation.
Retire or reduce overdue debts of any significance.
Complete remaining terms of probation or parole, including restitution payments.
Join a church, synagogue, or other faith-based community; attend and participate in activities beyond formal weekly services.
Get counseling; stay in counseling; work the program. Note: if there is any hint of drug or alcohol abuse in the facts on which the license was denied or is subject to discipline, completion of a formal treatment program (not necessarily in-patient) is a necessity. Make a careful choice of program; opting in and out of different programs is counter-productive evidence of rehabilitation.
Pursue additional education or professional or vocational training. Astute choices may secure credit that will later satisfy continuing education requirements for the license. But in all events, take a course or even two. In-person counts much more heavily than on-line course-work.
Break ties with, and stay away from, former associates with criminal histories or drug or alcohol connections.
Ask for letters of personal knowledge pertaining to character and reputation for integrity, honesty and truthfulness from ALL friends and relatives and from any present or former employers, co-workers, neighbors, customers or clients, pastors or spiritual counselors, psychotherapists, probation and parole officers—anyone who has a basis for personal knowledge. The absence of any such letters is a conspicuous omission from the necessary and expected evidence at the administrative hearing. Conversely, there cannot be too much evidence of personal attestations of good character. Each letter needs be no more than a paragraph or two—a page at most; each one will count heavily. It can be hard to summon one’s pride and ask for this kind of assistance. Do it anyway.
Pick at least two ways to be involved in a giving and contributive way with the larger community. Choose from any and all of the universe of good deeds. Volunteer at shelters (homeless, animal, domestic violence, children); coach a kids’ sports team; walk for a charity’s fund-raising effort. The community’s needs for charitable and civic contributions are, sadly, endless. And no matter how busy, tired, broke, depressed, pre-occupied, stressed-out or otherwise needy the applicant or licensee feels at this time, there is no getting around the fact that charitable and civic activities count highly in the assessment of character by the licensing agency and by the administrative law judge. A serious challenge to the State’s objections to the applicant or licensee will include a showing of active and enthusiastic participation in two charitable or civic activities, evidenced by a short written attestation from the local coordinator of each.
The Critical Task of Preparing Comprehensive and Persuasive Character Evidence, is often an outcome-determinative step in the fight to obtain or retain an occupational or professional license. Compiling such evidence requires perseverance, dedication, imagination, and sometimes the affection and support of others. It can be expensive, burdensome, time-consuming, and emotionally uncomfortable. It is up to the denied applicant or the licensee at risk of losing the license to determine whether the occupational or professional license will be worth the effort. But if the applicant or licensee is going to go as far in the process as an evidentiary hearing, if there is a determination to put the State of California to its proof in its initial decision to prohibit licensed work, then it only makes sense to go the whole distance. For those who are in it to win it, Preparing Comprehensive and Persuasive Character Evidence, is truly a Critical and Essential Task.
For additional more specific information, contact any of the Partners of LicenseAdvocates Law Group LLP: http://www.LicenseAdvocates.com