In 2012 a case known as Matter of Arrabally,, the Board of Immigration Appeals ruled that travel with advance parole is not a “departure” and, therefore, does not trigger the 3/10 year unlawful presence bars.
Since 2012, people who were legally admitted into the United States, married a U.S. citizen, applied for permanent residence, including a request for Advance Parole, can travel with the Advance Parole document and will be admitted back into the United States. Such travel would not be considered departure and thus would not trigger the 3/10 unlawful presence bar. As a result, the person's status would be the same as before he left.
Matter of Arrabally
In the Matter of Arrabally a married couple from India filed an application for Adjustment of Status as well as Advance Parole. While their application was pending, the couple, using their Advance Parole document, decided to travel to India to visit their elderly parents. Upon their return, the couple was allowed to renter the United States. However, the adjustment of status applications of Arrabally and Yerrabelly were denied on the basis that they were inadmissible for 10 years, and were subsequently placed in removal proceedings.
The Board of Immigration Appeals held that travel on advance parole was not a "departure"within the meaning of the statute and hence did not trigger the ground of inadmissibility that bars admission after the accrual of unlawful presence .
In short, any individual who physically leaves the United States pursuant to a grant of advance parole, that individual shall not have made a "departure " within the meaning of section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of the INA, i.e, such individual will not trigger the 3- and 10-year bars of inadmissibility.
Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on
their profile in addition to the information we collect from state
bar associations and other organizations that license legal
professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo
with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do
What determines Avvo Rating?
Experience & background
Years licensed, work experience, education
Legal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awards
Legal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagements
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in .
Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.