"If a contract isn't in writing, there's no contract."
There's a grain of truth to this one, but only a grain. Same goes for its cousin "I never signed anything." A few kinds of contracts MUST be written -- notably certain real estate and debt contracts and contracts that can't be performed within 1 year and exclusive copyright licenses or sales. Otherwise, oral contracts are every bit as enforceable as written ones, although they're harder to prove and harder to ensure that important details won't get left out. Written contracts have many pages of terms, so they'll include many more contingencies and prevent many more uncertainties than an oral contract made up of general WHO WHAT WHEN WHERE basics. But an oral contract that has all these things is enforceable--without paperwork and without any signatures, and so is an "implied in fact" contract, which is based on conduct of the parties, who, by acting like there's a contract, create one. Oral and implied in fact contracts have to be proved indirectly, through oral testimony and supporting documents like emails, texts, checks, invoices, etc.
"I can sign this contract and change my mind within 3 days."
This is infrequently the case, although it's widely thought that all contracts have a "cooling off" period. The best rule of thumb to follow is that if the contract doesn't say you have a right to cancel, you don't.
The "3-day cooling off period" for canceling a contract does NOT apply to new or used car purchases. As of July 1, 2006, the "Car Buyers Bill of Rights" offers the "option" of a cooling off period of 2 days for a fee.
Under Federal law, certain secured credit transactions (15 U.S.C. 1635) and unsolicited door-to-door sales (or sales at trade shows, but not craft fairs) (16 C.F.R. part 429) MUST disclose the right to cancel the transaction within 3 days.
This myth is 100% wrong. There's just no such thing as a standard contract. Every lawyer has their own contract forms, many businesses have their own, and a quick look on the internet shows how many different versions of the "same" contract there are. This myth is dangerous because it can lead to the equally wrong belief that a contract presented as "standard" is also fair and reasonable.
Contracts need to be tailored to the parties and what they want and have agreed to, and while there may be some language that's typically included in contracts, the best drafting is done by applying the law to the facts and expressing the parties' desired end result.
"Boilerplate terms don't matter."
Another myth that's never true. "Boilerplate" used to mean steel plates for boilers. Now it means "standard" and non-material contract terms. But as noted, there's no such thing as "standard." When lawyers refer to boilerplate, they mean clauses typically found in contracts that determine non-substantive things, things that aren't the material WHO WHAT WHEN WHERE terms. These include which state's law governs and which jurisdiction, when and how the prevailing party gets their legal fees in a dispute, whether you can assign the contract, what the parties' relationship is, how notice to each party can be given and when it's effective, whether waiver of breach can continue without affecting the party's right to claim breach, and whether the agreement constitutes the sole agreement between the parties, among many others. The wording of these clauses can make all the difference in the world. See my Legal Guide "How to Draft a Contract" to see how one of these clauses, forum selection, can vary. and why it matters. Contract language always matters. If you don't pay attention to the "boilerplate" terms, you may not have an enforceable contract.
Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on
their profile in addition to the information we collect from state
bar associations and other organizations that license legal
professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo
with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do
What determines Avvo Rating?Experience & background
Years licensed, work experience, education
Legal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awards
Legal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagements
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in .
Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.