Generally, the court of appeal will not consider an argument raised for the first time on appeal. Common examples of issues that the court will not review on appeal are evidentiary objections not made at trial, affirmative defenses not pled in an answer and claims not pled in a complaint. (Greenwich S.F., LLC v. Wong (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 739, 767). The Court of Appeal generally limits its considerations to arguments appearing within the four corners of the appellate record. If you are appearing at a court such as Los Angeles Superior Court, which no longer automatically provides court reporters, consider hiring a court reporter in advance to enhance your appellate rights. If you have made arguments in chambers and lost, consider repeating those arguments on the record to preserve the issue on appeal.
Consult an appellate specialist as early as possible
Many times a trial lawyer will not consult with an appellate specialist until after the appellate process is well underway and sometimes key deadlines have passed. For example, when your opponent files a notice of appeal, your time to file a notice of cross-appeal is triggered. An appellate specialist can advise you as to whether a cross-appeal should be filed and the consequences of not filing one. As another example, after a notice of appeal is filed, the appellant will designate the record that the appellate court will consider on appeal. The time for a trial lawyer to respond and counter designate the record on appeal is limited. An appellate specialist can advise you as to what portions of the record should be included for the appeal and how to counter designate in response to an appellant's deficient notice.
Be wary of waiver
If you are appalling a judgment, be careful not to do anything that would be deemed a waiver of the appeal. For example, accepting the benefits of the judgment appealed from could be deemed a waiver of the appeal. (Satchmed Plaza Owners Ass'n v. UWMC Hosp. Co. (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1034, 1041-42).
Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.
What determines Avvo Rating?Experience & background
Years licensed, work experience, education
Legal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awards
Legal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagements
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in .
Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.