A modificiation requires some consideraton in order to be enforceable. I think your best position is to take the position that even though you did not make a new written contract you agreed verbally to give him a forebearance on the collection of the debt due to his financial situation and now that he has the funds, he is refusing to pay you. It is his responsibility to bring up the statute of limitations. In small claims, with your witness, the judge or commisioner may do equity and order payment of the debt. Don't forget to calculate the interest if that was agreed to as well? The filing and service of the small claims complaint might also change your friend's mind and cause them to settle the debt before the hearing?
Legal disclaimer:This message does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Any statements are made for general informational purposes and do not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client privilege is created by this communication. Attorney is licensed in California only.Ask a similar question
No, the verbal acknowledgement without additional consideration would be insufficient to modify the written agreement.
However, the statute of limitations is a defense, and the defendant would have to raise it as a defense, even in small claims court.
Frank W. Chen has been licensed to practice law in California since 1988. The information presented here is general in nature and is not intended, nor should be construed, as legal advice for a particular case. This Avvo.com posting does not create any attorney-client relationship with the author. For specific advice about your particular situation, please consult with your own attorney.Ask a similar question
While I basically agree with Mr. Chen another argument I would make would be that there was consideration received from the borrower in that exchange for his reassurance of the loan and an extension of time to pay which was in essence extending the statute. He received the consideration and having additional time to pay in exchange for you receiving the consideration of a waiver of what would have been a running the statute of limitations.
This participating Attorney does not warrant any information provided, nor are we creating an Attorney-Client relationship by providing said information to you on this site. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute, offer, induce, promise, or contract of any kind. The content provided is presented as a courtesy to be used only for informational purposes and is not represented to be error free. The Law Offices of John N. Kitta makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to its answer to inquiries, and such representations and warranties are being expressly disclaimed. Given limited facts, we are attempting to share relevant information concerning this area of the law as a public service.Ask a similar question