Marrying your boyfriend will exempt you from having to testify against him. However, it does not mean the Commonwealth would necessarily drop the case if they have other evidence. Talk to your boyfriend's lawyer to find out if invoking the marital privilege would be the best thing for your boyfriend's case, or if your truthful testimony that the police report was wrong would be more helpful.
Questions and answers on Avvo are not confidential and do not establish an attorney-client relationship. Do not post confidential information on a public forum.
This would be what your marriage is based around? To avoid testifying against a boyfriend? The prosecution may have other evidence to pursue charges.
The information on this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. Attorney Satterwhite invites you to call or e-mail for more information, however, visiting his website or contacting him does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send information that may be considered privileged or confidential prior to establishing an attorney-client relationship.
The spousal privilege prevents the Commonwealth (DA) from making you testify against your spouse in a crime that does not involve you as a victim. You can waive this right and testify.
Disqualification of a spouse means that a spouse may not testify against the other, even if they both want to, regarding private o communications between the two of you. This disqualification does not apply in cases where you are the victim. It also only applies if the communication happened while you were married. If he threatened you, you do not have the privilege not to testify about that if you get married after it happens.
The only real exclusion I can see is if you were involved in some way--equally responsible because you assaulted him as well. Then you can refuse to testify to implicate yourself. 5th Amendment.
In other words, you would not be protected by the spousal privilege for a case where you are the victim.
Providing users with information is not intended to create an attorney/client relationship.
There may be other privileges that you can use to keep from testifying. You should consult a lawyer other than your boyfriend's lawyer to understand your options. Maybe you can have the same result without getting married.
THIS COMMUNICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE CREATION OF AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. Legal rights vary greatly depending on specific facts, and it is impossible on the basis of the recitation of a few facts to determine whether or not an individual has a viable case, what is the full range of options, or what limitations exist which may bar an individual's potential claims. ON THE BASIS OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ME, I RECOMMEND THAT YOU PROMPTLY CONSULT AN ATTORNEY TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF LEGAL RECOURSE, IF ANY, YOU MAY HAVE. YOU SHOULD NOT RELY ON ANYTHING I HAVE STATED AS ADVICE TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN TO CONSULT AN ATTORNEY TO DISCUSS FULLY AN APPROPRIATE COURSE OF ACTION.
Massachusetts has a "marital privilege" statute which generally speaking allows a husband or wife to refuse to testify at a criminal trial against the other. Both the Federal and State Consitutions provide for a privilege of any person not to incriminate themself. If your truthful testimony could in any way subject you to prosecution for a crime then you could exercise your Fifth Amendment privilege and refuse to testify without having to take the dramatic step of marriage. Marrying the guy (who allegedly beat you) seems like quite a drastic step, don't you think? Would you say that it is a good environment for your child to be living in the household with a man who allegedly beats his/her mother? You two have a child and have not yet married; why not? I am not trying to get moralistic on you here; I just feel you should have a better reason to marry someone other than it may get him out of the case. Good Luck.
Any statements you made to police that tend to demonstrate his guilt would be admissible if you purposely got married to avoid from having to testify under the doctrine of forfeiture by wrong doing. Here the your boyfriend would forfeit the right to cross examine and confront witnesses if the court finds that you and him purposely got married to prevent the testimony. This was decided recently in a case called Commonwealth v szerlong. So you're decision to get married would be a bad one based on what you have said here. However, if you had another privilege - such as the privilege against self incrimination - that would not open the door to your statements being admitted. I also agree that if there is other evidence such as a 911 call or photographs that show injuries or other witnesses obviously, the commonwealth will go forward without you. If you have questions beyond that you should consult a lawyer. Only an attorney who practices criminal law can assess whether you have a valid privilege. Good luck