Skip to main content

Wife got a Ticket in Ridgeland 5/28 for speeding in a big speed trap. She went to Ridgeland today for what she thought was court

Ridgeland, SC |

It turned out that it was 3 officers from the Ridgeland Police Dept. That gave people that showed up a choice, pay the $133 speeding ticket with the points or have them re-wright the ticket to careless operation with the same $133 but no point. Seams to be an unlawful violation of my wife's rights. Fishy that that you show up and no court or judge. How is this possible. What are we to do, I been out of work for a while and have been trying to get old military injures taken care of from the VA, Wife just finished school and is getting ready to start her 1st paramedic job. just unemployment for us and our 7 kids right now. What are we to do?

+ Read More

Attorney answers 2

Best Answer

The speed trap in Ridgeland is currently illegal and against state law. However, the town is simply continuing to write the speeding tickets. There is also a push to make such South Carolina speed traps legal. What most people are doing is to plead not guilty and ask for a jury trial.



with no judge to oversee the system, if seams like it is against 1's rights. this is what is getting to me the most.


Not only is that speed trap illegal and against state law as evidenced by an opinion by the SC Attorney General's office, but it is also unlawful for any traffic violation whatsoever to be written on anything other than a SC traffic ticket form.

The Ridgeland Court does not have jurisdiction to issue process outside of SC and it is my understanding that the tickets are mailed to the "offenders" in their home states with the threat that they will be prosecuted here and then have the offense appear in their home state pursuant to the interstate compact.

The process of sending a ticket in the mail to an out of state recipient is unconstitutional and Ridgeland lacks the jurisdiction to serve the process out of state and to enforce the ticket without it having been validly served on the "offender". The problem is that the people who receive these tickets either do not have the time or resources to fight it and just pay the tickets in order to avoid the whole process. Other people show up at court because they do not know that the process itself is illegal and then they are within the jurisdiction of the Ridgeland authorities.

We also have a statute that places a short time limitation (merely hours) within which a ticket must be served upon the person upon whom it is issued.

My thoughts on this are that an action could be brought in US District Court to enjoin this process pursuant to a 5th and 14th amendment violation of the US Constitution. Another possibility would be to sue the Town of Ridgeland in US District Court pursuant to a section 1983 violation of a citizens civil rights. Both of these remedies would require a person to expend significant money and resources for what is a small fine (illegal as it is).

Since the Town of Ridgeland is doing this for the purpose of enriching its own pockets (although they falsely claim that it is for the purpose of public safety), the better route would be to bring a class action lawsuit in federal court against the Town, the Mayor, and the Police Chief seeking significant damages on behalf of the entire class of persons (out of state residents who are served with illegal process). The costs of the litigation, the burden of discovery, and the impact that it would have on their insurance providers would be enough to bring this illegal process to a screeching halt.

Our State Supreme Court could bring an end to the whole matter simply by using its power to regulate the courts and issuing an order prohibiting any judicial officer from hearing or enforcing these unlawful citations.

DISCLAIMER – LEGAL ADVICE If you found this answer helpful, let me know by clicking the Thumbs-Up tab at the bottom. You may mark this as a Best Answer for the time I spent crafting this and thinking about your matter. My comments are not intended to establish an attorney-client relationship, are not confidential, and are not intended to constitute legal advice. Proper legal advice can only be given by an attorney who agrees to represent you, who reviews the facts of your specific case, who does not have a conflict of interest preventing the representation, and who is licensed to practice in the appropriate jurisdiction where the legal issue may be filed or in the state where the law applies.