Just curious. A kind lawyer responded to my earlier question regarding a motion for dismissal. However, I am curious why a lawyer would serve a lawsuit that is clearly outside the Statutes of Limitations (SOL)?
This complaint is for Breach of Oral contract and in the complaint they state that the contract was entered into in 2004.
Florida statutes state 4 years SOL for Oral contracts.
My wife's uncle has loads of money and he is trying to screw with us saying that she owe him money and we never agreed to this ever.
All of a sudden out of the blue, he files a lawsuit saying my wife breached and oral contract to pay him money. Therefore, I'm just curious, do some lawyers do whatever their clients want them to do, even though its clearly pointless?