There is a rebuttable presumtion that the driver of a vehicle that impacts with the rear of another vehicle is at fault. Under the above scenario both B and C could be held liable for A's injuries and damages depending upon the facts. Seeing that the vehicles were travelling and not standing still B has to allow for a safe distance between it and A. If the accident was such that B was following too closely he/she may be liable even if C caused the chain of events.
Disclaimer: This response is based solely upon the limited information provided in your question; additional facts may be necessary and may lead to a different response. The attorney responding to this question is licensed only in Florida and this response is intended for informational purpose only and not intended as legal advice in your particular state. Additionally, the response is not intended to create an attorney client relationship.Ask a similar question
Liability in a crash involving three moving vehicles is not always simple. "B" may be at fault as well. I would hire counsel and likely a lawsuit will be needed to determine percentages of fault.Ask a similar question
Order of claim does matter in exhaustion of benefits. That is why you should always carry uninsured/under-insured motorist coverage.Ask a similar question
A needs to sue C and B. The jury will apportion liability between C and B and the damages assessed against them will be split proportionally.
This is a summary based on incomplete facts. You should not rely on it as legal advise. No attorney-client relationship is intended to be formed. You may call me 772-562-4570; email me email@example.com, or visit my website http://www.millerlawoffices.usAsk a similar question
Without knowing additional information, it appears that vehicle C would have the primary liability. There could be extenuating circumstances that could place some liability on vehicle B as well. More information is needed.
An attorney-client relationship is NOT created through the use of this website or by answering this particular post. Each claim is different and must be judged on its own merits. The response herein does not constitute legal advice. The response is in the form of legal education and is intended to provide general information about the matter within the question. Questions may not include significant and important facts that could significantly change the reply. Mr. Price is licensed in MO only and strongly advises the questioner to confer with an attorney in his or her particular state in order to ensure proper advice is received.Ask a similar question
Premises liability for personal injuries Personal injury Police reports for personal injuries Fault laws and personal injury cases Types of personal injuries Car Accidents Property liability Police interrogation Traffic tickets Tickets for following too closely Traffic tickets and car insurance rates Car repairs
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.